The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequences of Francisella Strains and Utilization for Determination of the Phylogeny of the Genus and for Identification of Strains by PCR
Abstract
The 16S ribosomal DNAs (rDNAs) of two strains of Francisella tularensis and one strain of Francisella philomiragia were sequenced. On the basis of phylogenetic analysis data, the genus Francisella was placed in the gamma subclass of the Proteobacteria. The most closely related organism was the intracellular bacterium Wolbachia persica. The sequenced 16S rDNA molecules of the Francisella species exhibited very high levels of similarity (98.5 to 99.9%). Two variable regions, comprising 390 to 450 nucleotides of the 16S rDNA molecules of 17 additional Francisella strains, including members of the species F. tularensis and F. philomiragia, were also sequenced. At most, six nucleotide differences were observed among the sequences of the F. tularensis strains. The sequence of Francisella novicida was virtually identical to the sequences of the F. tularensis strains, thereby supporting the hypothesis that these organisms are members of the same species. On the basis of the observed differences, primer pairs were designed to distinguish strains by using the PCR at the genus, species, and subspecies levels. This permitted sensitive identification of strains belonging to the genus Francisella and discrimination of the species F. tularensis and F. philomiragia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Cited by
Dumler, J. S., Barbet, A. F., Bekker, C. P., Dasch, G. A., Palmer, G. H., Ray, S. C., Rikihisa, Y., & Rurangirwa, F. R. (2001) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-51-6-2145 · Cited by 2,089
Ellis, J., Oyston, P. C. F., Green, M., & Titball, R. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.4.631-646.2002 · Cited by 819
Tularemia: History, Epidemiology, Pathogen Physiology, and Clinical Manifestations
SJÖSTEDT, A. (2007) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1409.009 · Cited by 593
The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia
Larsson, P., Oyston, P. C. F., Chain, P., Chu, M. C., Duffield, M., Fuxelius, H.-H., Garcia, E., Hälltorp, G., Johansson, D., Isherwood, K. E., et al. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1499 · Cited by 455
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- FORSMAN, M., SANDSTROM, G., & SJOSTEDT, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-46
- ISSN
- 0020-7713 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2102
- OpenAlex
- W2105736821
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequences of Francisella Strains and Utilization for Determination of the Phylogeny of the Genus and for Identification of Strains by PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-44-1-38
- The paper
- FORSMAN, M., SANDSTROM, G., & SJOSTEDT, A. (1994). Analysis of 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequences of Francisella Strains and Utilization for Determination of the Phylogeny of the Genus and for Identification of Strains by PCR. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-44-1-38
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.