The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cutting a Gordian Knot: Emended Classification and Description of the Genus Flavobacterium, Emended Description of the Family Flavobacteriaceae, and Proposal of Flavobacterium hydatis nom. nov. (Basonym, Cytophaga aquatilis Strohl and Tait 1978)
Abstract
The phylogenetic positions and G+C contents of most species belonging to the genera Flavobacterium, Cytophaga, and Flexibacter and several related taxa were determined. Most of the strains included in this study belong to rRNA superfamily V, as shown by DNA-rRNA hybridization data, but the three main genera are highly polyphyletic. Several so-called Cytophaga and Flexibacter species isolated from soil and freshwater cluster with the type species of the genus Flavobacterium, Flavobacterium aquatile, and with Flavobacterium branchiophilum. The fatty acid and protein profiles of members of this group of organisms were determined. We provide an emended description of the genus Flavobacterium and propose new combinations for the following 7 of the 10 validly described species included in this genus: Flavobacterium columnare, Flavobacterium flevense, Flavobacterium johnsoniae (we also correct the specific epithet of this taxon), Flavobacterium pectinovarum, Flavobacterium psychrophilum, Flavobacterium saccharophilum, and Flavobacterium succinicans. A new name, Flavobacterium hydatis, is proposed for [Cytophaga] aquatilis Strohl and Tait 1978. The emended genus Flavobacterium contains bacteria that have the following main characteristics: gram-negative rods that are motile by gliding, produce yellow colonies on agar, are chemoorganotrophs and aerobes, decompose several polysaccharides but not cellulose, and are widely distributed in soil and freshwater habitats. Three Flavobacterium species are pathogenic for fish. The G+C contents of Flavobacterium DNAs range from 32 to 37 mol%. An emended description of the family Flavobacteriaceae is also provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bruns, A., Rohde, M., & Berthe-Corti, L. (2001) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-51-6-1997 · Cited by 555
Diversity and association of psychrophilic bacteria in Antarctic sea ice
Bowman, J. P., McCammon, S. A., Brown, M. V., Nichols, D. S., & McMeekin, T. A. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.8.3068-3078.1997 · Cited by 522
Alegado, R. A., Brown, L. W., Cao, S., Dermenjian, R. K., Zuzow, R., Fairclough, S. R., Clardy, J., & King, N. (2012) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.00013 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- BERNARDET, J.-F., SEGERS, P., VANCANNEYT, M., BERTHE, F., KERSTERS, K., & VANDAMME, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 128-148
- ISSN
- 0020-7713 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2102
- OpenAlex
- W2003806322
- Cited by
- 880
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cutting a Gordian Knot: Emended Classification and Description of the Genus Flavobacterium, Emended Description of the Family Flavobacteriaceae, and Proposal of Flavobacterium hydatis nom. nov. (Basonym, Cytophaga aquatilis Strohl and Tait 1978). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-46-1-128
- The paper
- BERNARDET, J.-F., SEGERS, P., VANCANNEYT, M., BERTHE, F., KERSTERS, K., & VANDAMME, P. (1996). Cutting a Gordian Knot: Emended Classification and Description of the Genus Flavobacterium, Emended Description of the Family Flavobacteriaceae, and Proposal of Flavobacterium hydatis nom. nov. (Basonym, Cytophaga aquatilis Strohl and Tait 1978). International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-46-1-128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.