Cited by 248Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Azospirillum doebereinerae sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with the C4-grass Miscanthus.

Eckert, B, Weber, O B, Kirchhof, G, Halbritter, A, Stoffels, M, Hartmann, A·2001·International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

Abstract

A new group of nitrogen-fixing Azospirillum sp. bacteria was isolated from the roots of the C4-gramineous plant Miscanthus. Polyphasic taxonomy was performed, including auxanography using API galleries, physiological tests and 16S rRNA sequence comparison. The ability of the isolates to fix dinitrogen was evaluated by amplification of the nifD gene, immunodetection of the dinitrogenase reductase and acetylene-reduction assay. On the basis of these results, the nitrogen-fixing isolates represent a new species within the genus Azospirillum. Its closest phylogenetic neighbours, as deduced by 16S rDNA-based analysis, are Azospirillum lipoferum, Azospirillum largimobile and Azospirillum brasilense with 96.6, 96.6 and 95.9% sequence similarity, respectively. Two 16S rRNA-targeting oligonucleotide probes were developed which differentiate the new species from the other Azospirillum species by whole-cell fluorescence hybridization. Strains of the new species are curved rods or S-shaped, 1.0-1.5 microm in width and 2,0-3.0 microm in length, Gram-negative and motile with a single polar flagellum. Optimum growth occurs at 30 degrees C and at pH values between 6.0 and 7.0. No growth takes place at 37 degrees C. They have a respiratory type of metabolism, grow well on arabinose, D-fructose, gluconate, glucose, glycerol, malate, mannitol and sorbitol. They differ from A. largimobile and A. lipoferum by their inability to use N-acetylglucosamine and D-ribose, from A. lipoferum by their abil…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/00207713-51-1-17

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 248

Authors
Eckert, B., Weber, O. B., Kirchhof, G., Halbritter, A., Stoffels, M., & Hartmann, A.
Venue
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
Published
2001-01-01
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
17-26
ISSN
  • 1466-5026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-5034
OpenAlex
W2162182785
Cited by
248
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
novel bacterial species
MeSH terms
Base Composition, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Poaceae, Molecular Sequence Data, Nitrogen Fixation, Phenotype, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Oligonucleotide Probes, Azospirillum, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Plant Roots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review