The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Significance of Extracellular Enveloped Virus in the in vitro and in vivo Dissemination of Vaccinia
Abstract
The significance of extracellular enveloped vaccinia (EEV) for the in vitro and in vivo dissemination of vaccinia virus was investigated. The quantity of in vitro released extracellular virus correlated very closely with the ability of 13 vaccinia strains to cause long-range spread of infection (comet formation) in cell cultures infected at low m.o.i. but was not correlated with plaque size. The kinetics of virus spread after low m.o.i. was related to the amount of virus released from primary infected cells but not to their content of intracellular naked vaccinia (INV). Most extracellular vaccinia virus from IHD-J-infected RK-13 cells banded in CsCl density gradients as EEV (88%) while very little banded as INV (2%). Antisera to the enveloped prevented comet formation while antisera to INV did not. CsCl centrifugation of blood-borne extracellular virus from rabbits infected intravenously with vaccinia virus after cyclophosphamide treatment revealed that 64% of the virus banded as EEV but only 11% as INV. High in vitro EEV-yielding vaccinia strains were able to spread from the respiratory tract to the brains of mice and cause death. Low in vitro EEV-yielding vaccinia strains were generally not able to disseminate in vivo or cause mouse mortality. The notable exception to this trend was strain WR, which, although releasing small amounts of virus in vitro, could nevertheless very effectively disseminate in vivo, causing a high rate of mouse mortality. Treatment with anti-envelope serum protected mice from a lethal vaccinia infection whereas antiserum to inactivated INV did not. These results indicate that the in vitro dissemination of vaccinia infection is mediated by EEV and implicate EEV as having a role in the in vivo dissemination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The purification of four strains of poxvirus
Joklik, W. K. (1962) · Virology · doi:10.1016/0042-6822(62)90172-1 · Cited by 546
Payne, L. G. (1979) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.31.1.147-155.1979 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Cited by
Viral Subversion of the Immune System
Tortorella, D., Gewurz, B. E., Furman, M. H., Schust, D. J., & Ploegh, H. L. (2000) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.861 · Cited by 835
The formation and function of extracellular enveloped vaccinia virus
Smith, G. L., Vanderplasschen, A., & Law, M. (2002) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/0022-1317-83-12-2915 · Cited by 559
Yang, G., Pevear, D. C., Davies, M. H., Collett, M. S., Bailey, T., Rippen, S., Barone, L., Burns, C., Rhodes, G., Tohan, S., et al. (2005) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.79.20.13139-13149.2005 · Cited by 466
Buller, R. M. L., & Palumbo, G. J. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.55.1.80-122.1991 · Cited by 452
Actin-based motility of vaccinia virus
Cudmore, S., Cossart, P., Griffiths, G., & Way, M. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378636a0 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Payne, L. G.
- Venue
- Journal of General Virology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1980-09-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-100
- ISSN
- 0022-1317 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2099
- OpenAlex
- W2085983094
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significance of Extracellular Enveloped Virus in the in vitro and in vivo Dissemination of Vaccinia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/0022-1317-50-1-89
- The paper
- Payne, L. G. (1980). Significance of Extracellular Enveloped Virus in the in vitro and in vivo Dissemination of Vaccinia. Journal of General Virology. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-50-1-89
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.