The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biological Evidence that Scrapie Agent Has an Independent Genome
Abstract
There are many distinct strains of scrapie agent, identified by their relative incubation periods and quantitative and qualitative neuropathological properties in inbred mice of particular genotypes. When serially passaged under specified conditions of mouse strain, route of infection and dose of infectivity these properties are stable. However, they may change in a predictable manner if the passage strategy is altered. The scrapie strain 87A shows what has previously been defined as Class III stability; it is stable when passaged at low dose in C57BL mice, but often suddenly changes its properties in the course of a single passage if high doses are used, always resulting in the same new strain. The latter, designated 7D, has shorter incubation periods and more extensive pathology than 87A, properties which are subsequently stable on serial passage even at high dose. This phenomenon has been seen repeatedly using scrapie isolates from six different natural cases in five different breeds of sheep. These isolates are closely similar in all their properties, showing them to be independent isolations of the 87A strain; there have been no isolations of 87A in which the phenomenon did not occur. On the other hand, none of the many other scrapie strains used in the same laboratory have shown this change. 87A brain samples consistently behave as if they contain 87A together with a smaller amount of 7D. This is so even after 87A has previously been passaged at high dilution, well beyond the limiting dilution for 7D, a procedure which would eliminate any minor agent strain originally present in the isolate. Therefore it is highly likely that the 7D in tissues of mice infected with 87A is generated de novo at each passage by mutational change from 87A during the incubation period. The established fact that many different strains exist and the considerable evidence that mutation can occur lead to the conclusion that scrapie agent has its own independently replicating genome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prusiner, S. B. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.23.13363 · Cited by 5,373
Eight prion strains have PrPSc molecules with different conformations
Safar, J., Wille, H., Itri, V., Groth, D., Serban, H., Torchia, M., Cohen, F. E., & Prusiner, S. B. (1998) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/2654 · Cited by 1,245
Prusiner, S. B., Scott, M., Foster, D., Pan, K.-M., Groth, D., Mirenda, C., Torchia, M., Yang, S.-L., Serban, D., Carlson, G. A., et al. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90134-z · Cited by 871
Neurodegenerative Diseases and Prions
Prusiner, S. B. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105173442006 · Cited by 772
Scott, M., Foster, D., Mirenda, C., Serban, D., Coufal, F., Wälchli, M., Torchia, M., Groth, D., Carlson, G., DeArmond, S. J., et al. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90608-9 · Cited by 697
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruce, M. E., & Dickinson, A. G.
- Venue
- Journal of General Virology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1987-01-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-89
- ISSN
- 0022-1317 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2099
- OpenAlex
- W2083346670
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Evidence that Scrapie Agent Has an Independent Genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/0022-1317-68-1-79
- The paper
- Bruce, M. E., & Dickinson, A. G. (1987). Biological Evidence that Scrapie Agent Has an Independent Genome. Journal of General Virology. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-68-1-79
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.