Cited by 105Viral Infections and Immunology ResearchEvolution and Genetic DynamicsVirology and Viral Diseases

Natural genetic recombination between co-circulating heterotypic enteroviruses

Oprisan, Gabriela, Combiescu, Mariana, Guillot, Sophie, Caro, Valerie, Combiescu, Andrei, Delpeyroux, Francis, Crainic, Radu·2002·Journal of General Virology

Abstract

Natural recombination in poliovirus is a frequent phenomenon. In practice, whenever different genotypes have the opportunity to infect the same individual, a high proportion of viruses with recombinant genomes are excreted. To determine whether enteroviruses other than poliovirus can naturally produce viable virions with recombinant genomes, we studied the molecular features of two distant regions of the viral genomes – the VP1 coding region and the 3D polymerase coding region – of the echovirus serotypes associated with a large outbreak of aseptic meningitis. Nucleotide sequences of nine epidemic strains [belonging to echovirus serotypes 4 (E4), 7 (E7) and 30 (E30)] in the two genomic regions (300 nt of VP1 and 520 nt of 3D polymerase) were compared to prototype and field strains, and phylogenetic trees were generated from alignments. In the VP1 region, each of the three epidemic serotypes clustered with the homotypic prototype strain, whereas in the 3D polymerase region, E7 and E30 grouped as a single cluster, distant from the two corresponding prototype strains. This suggests that one of these two E7 and E30 strains has evolved through recombination with the other or that both have acquired the 3D polymerase coding region from a common ancestor. Our results suggest that such genetic recombinations between different echovirus serotypes are possible when multiple epidemic strains are circulating simultaneously.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/0022-1317-83-9-2193

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 105

Authors
Oprisan, G., Combiescu, M., Guillot, S., Caro, V., Combiescu, A., Delpeyroux, F., & Crainic, R.
Affiliations
  • Cantacuzino Institute, Splaiul Independentei 103, Bucharest, R-70.100 Romania1
  • Institutul Cantacuzino (RO)
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
  • Molecular Epidemiology of Enteroviruses, Pasteur Institute, 25 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France2
Venue
Journal of General Virology
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
83
Issue
9
Pages
2193-2200
ISSN
  • 0022-1317 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2099
OpenAlex
W2152897870
Cited by
105
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of General Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
enterovirus, echovirus, echovirus 7, echovirus 30, phylogenetic analysis, viral evolution
MeSH terms
Disease Outbreaks, Enterovirus Infections, Humans, Meningitis, Aseptic, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Recombination, Genetic, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, RNA, Viral, Romania, Genome, Viral, Enterovirus B, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review