The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enzyme Polymorphism and Genetic Population Structure in Escherichia coli and Shigella
Abstract
Electrophoretically demonstrable variation in 12 enzymes was studied in more than 1 600 isolates of Escherichia coli from human and animal sources and in 123 strains of the four species of Shigella. All 12 enzymes were polymorphic; and the number of allozymes (mobility variants), which were equated with alleles, averaged 9.3 per locus in E. coli. For Shigella species, the mean number of alleles was 2.9 per locus. Some 77% of the allozymes recorded in Shigella were shared with E. coli. A total of 302 unique genotypic combinations of alleles over the 12 loci (electrophoretic types, ETs) was distinguished, of which 279 represented E. coli and 23 were Shigella. Among electrophoretic types, mean allelic diversity per locus was 0.52 for E. coli and 0.29 for Shigella. It was estimated that there are, on the average, about 0.3 detectable codon differences per locus between pairs of strains of E. coli and Shigella, which is roughly equivalent to 1.2 amino acid differences per enzyme. Evidence that the enzyme loci studied are a random sample of the genome is provided by a significant positive correlation between estimates of genetic divergence between pairs of strains obtained by DNA reassociation tests and estimates of genetic distance between the same strains based on electrophoresis. A principal components analysis of allozyme profiles revealed that the 302 ETs fall into three overlapping clusters, reflecting strong non-random associations of alleles, largely at four loci. Each of the four ETs of E. coli that have been most frequently recovered from natural populations has an allozyme profile that is very similar to, or identical with, the hypothetical modal ET of one of the groups. ETs of Shigella fall into two of the groups. No biological significance can at present bbe attributed to the genetic structure revealed by Multilocus electrophoretic techniques. The electrophoretic data are fully compatible with other molecular and more conventional evidence of a close affinity between E. coli and Shigella, and they raise questions regarding the present assignments of certain strains to species. In support of evidence from DNA reassociation tests and serotyping, the present study suggests that S. sonnei is homogeneous in chromosomal genotype.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smith, J. M., Smith, N. H., O'Rourke, M., & Spratt, B. G. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.10.4384 · Cited by 1,802
Herzer, P. J., Inouye, S., Inouye, M., & Whittam, T. S. (1990) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.172.11.6175-6181.1990 · Cited by 533
Self-citationOrganization of the bacterial chromosome
KRAWIEC, S., & Riley, M. (1990) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.54.4.502-539.1990 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Ochman, H., Whittam, T. S., Caugant, D. A., & Selander, R. K.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1983-09-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2715-2726
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2139489138
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enzyme Polymorphism and Genetic Population Structure in Escherichia coli and Shigella. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-129-9-2715
- The paper
- Ochman, H., Whittam, T. S., Caugant, D. A., & Selander, R. K. (1983). Enzyme Polymorphism and Genetic Population Structure in Escherichia coli and Shigella. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-129-9-2715
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.