Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Enzyme Polymorphism and Genetic Population Structure in Escherichia coli and Shigella

Ochman, H., Whittam, T. S., Caugant, D. A., Selander, R. K.·1983·Microbiology

Abstract

Electrophoretically demonstrable variation in 12 enzymes was studied in more than 1 600 isolates of Escherichia coli from human and animal sources and in 123 strains of the four species of Shigella. All 12 enzymes were polymorphic; and the number of allozymes (mobility variants), which were equated with alleles, averaged 9.3 per locus in E. coli. For Shigella species, the mean number of alleles was 2.9 per locus. Some 77% of the allozymes recorded in Shigella were shared with E. coli. A total of 302 unique genotypic combinations of alleles over the 12 loci (electrophoretic types, ETs) was distinguished, of which 279 represented E. coli and 23 were Shigella. Among electrophoretic types, mean allelic diversity per locus was 0.52 for E. coli and 0.29 for Shigella. It was estimated that there are, on the average, about 0.3 detectable codon differences per locus between pairs of strains of E. coli and Shigella, which is roughly equivalent to 1.2 amino acid differences per enzyme. Evidence that the enzyme loci studied are a random sample of the genome is provided by a significant positive correlation between estimates of genetic divergence between pairs of strains obtained by DNA reassociation tests and estimates of genetic distance between the same strains based on electrophoresis. A principal components analysis of allozyme profiles revealed that the 302 ETs fall into three overlapping clusters, reflecting strong non-random associations of alleles, largely at four loci. Each of the four ETs of E. coli that have been most frequently recovered from natural populations has an allozyme profile that is very similar to, or identical with, the hypothetical modal ET of one of the groups. ETs of Shigella fall into two of the groups. No biological significance can at present bbe attributed to the genetic structure revealed by Multilocus electrophoretic techniques. The electrophoretic data are fully compatible with other molecular and more conventional evidence of a close affinity between E. coli and Shigella, and they raise questions regarding the present assignments of certain strains to species. In support of evidence from DNA reassociation tests and serotyping, the present study suggests that S. sonnei is homogeneous in chromosomal genotype.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/00221287-129-9-2715

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Ochman, H., Whittam, T. S., Caugant, D. A., & Selander, R. K.
Venue
Microbiology
Published
1983-09-01
Volume
129
Issue
9
Pages
2715-2726
ISSN
  • 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2080
OpenAlex
W2139489138
Cited by
238
References
0
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enzyme Polymorphism and Genetic Population Structure in Escherichia coli and Shigella. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-129-9-2715
The paper
Ochman, H., Whittam, T. S., Caugant, D. A., & Selander, R. K. (1983). Enzyme Polymorphism and Genetic Population Structure in Escherichia coli and Shigella. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-129-9-2715

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.