The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physiology of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in Anaerobic Glucose-Limited Chemostat Culturesx
Abstract
The physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 8066 was studied in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures in a mineral medium supplemented with ergosterol and Tween 80. The organism had a mu max of 0.31 h-1 and a Ks for glucose of 0.55 mM. At a dilution rate of 0.10 h-1, a maximal yield of 0.10 g biomass (g glucose)-1 was observed. The yield steadily declined with increasing dilution rates, so a maintenance coefficient for anaerobic growth could not be estimated At a dilution rate of 0.10 h-1, the yield of the S. cerevisiae strain H1022 was considerably higher than for CBS 8066, despite a similar cell composition. The major difference between the two yeast strains was that S. cerevisiae H1022 did not produce acetate, suggesting that the observed difference in cell yield may be ascribed to an uncoupling effect of acetic acid. The absence of acetate formation in H1022 correlated with a relatively high level of acetyl-CoA synthetase. The uncoupling effect of weak acids on anaerobic growth was confirmed in experiments in which a weak acid (acetate or propionate) was added to the medium feed. This resulted in a reduction in yield and an increase in specific ethanol production. Both yeasts required approximately 35 mg oleic acid (g biomass)-1 for optimal growth. Lower or higher concentrations of this fatty acid, supplied as Tween 80, resulted in uncoupling of dissimilatory and assimilatory processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glycerol Metabolism in Yeasts: Pathways of Utilization and Production
Gancedo, C., Gancedo, J. M., & Sols, A. (1968) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1968.tb00353.x · Cited by 248
Cited by
van den Berg, R. A., Hoefsloot, H. C., Westerhuis, J. A., Smilde, A. K., & van der Werf, M. J. (2006) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-142 · Cited by 2,450
Verduyn, C., Postma, E., Scheffers, W. A., & Van Dijken, J. P. (1992) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.320080703 · Cited by 1,510
Self-citationBioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification
Jönsson, L. J., Alriksson, B., & Nilvebrant, N.-O. (2013) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-16 · Cited by 1,382
Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification
Palmqvist, E., & Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (2000) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(99)00160-1 · Cited by 1,370
Genome-Scale Reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Metabolic Network
Förster, J., Famili, I., Fu, P., Palsson, B. Ø., & Nielsen, J. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.234503 · Cited by 1,069
Metadata
- Authors
- Verduyn, C., Postma, E., Scheffers, W. A., & van Dijken, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of General Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1990-03-01
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 395-403
- ISSN
- 0022-1287 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039609168
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiology of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in Anaerobic Glucose-Limited Chemostat Culturesx. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-136-3-395
- The paper
- Verduyn, C., Postma, E., Scheffers, W. A., & van Dijken, J. P. (1990). Physiology of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in Anaerobic Glucose-Limited Chemostat Culturesx. Journal of General Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-136-3-395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.