The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Synergistic interaction between fungal cell wall degrading enzymes and different antifungal compounds enhances inhibition of spore germination
Abstract
Different classes of cell wall degrading enzymes produced by the biocontrol fungi Trichoderma harzianum and Gliocladium virens inhibited spore germination of Botrytis cinerea in a bioassay in vitro. The addition of any chitinolytic or glucanolytic enzyme to the reaction mixture synergistically enhanced the antifungal properties of five different fungitoxic compounds against B. cinerea. The chemicals tested were gliotoxin, flusilazole, miconazole, captan and benomyl. Dose response curves were determined for each combination of toxin and enzyme, and in all cases the ED50 values of the mixtures were substantially lower than ED50 values of the two compounds used alone. For instance, the addition of endochitinase from T. harzianum at a concentration of 10 micrograms ml-1 reduced the ED50 values of toxins up to 86-fold. The level of synergism appeared to be higher when enzymes were combined with toxins having primary sites of action associated with membrane structure, compared with pesticides having multiple or cytoplasmic sites of action. Among enzymes tested, the highest levels of synergism with synthetic fungicides were detected for the endochitinase from T. harzianum strain P1, which, when used alone, was the most effective chitinolytic enzyme against phytopathogenic fungi of those tested. The use of hydrolytic enzymes to synergistically enhance the antifungal ability of fungitoxic compounds may reduce the impact of some chemical pesticides on plants and animals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins: A focus on PR peptides
Sels, J., Mathys, J., De Coninck, B. M. A., Cammue, B. P. A., & De Bolle, M. F. C. (2008) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.06.011 · Cited by 836
Trichoderma-based Products and their Widespread Use in Agriculture
Woo, S. L., Ruocco, M., Vinale, F., Nigro, M., Marra, R., Lombardi, N., Pascale, A., Lanzuise, S., Manganiello, G., & Lorito, M. (2014) · The Open Mycology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874437001408010071 · Cited by 658
Self-citationBiocontrol of Soilborne Plant Pathogens.
Handelsman, J., & Stabb, E. V. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1855 · Cited by 624
Phenazines and their role in biocontrol by Pseudomonas bacteria
Chin‐A‐Woeng, T. F. C., Bloemberg, G. V., & Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00686.x · Cited by 375
Chitinases in biological control
Herrera-Estrella, A., & Chet, I. (1999) · Chitin and Chitinases · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8757-1_12 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorito, M., Peterbauer, C., Hayes, C. K., & Harman, G. E.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1994-03-01
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 623-629
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2050400621
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synergistic interaction between fungal cell wall degrading enzymes and different antifungal compounds enhances inhibition of spore germination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-140-3-623
- The paper
- Lorito, M., Peterbauer, C., Hayes, C. K., & Harman, G. E. (1994). Synergistic interaction between fungal cell wall degrading enzymes and different antifungal compounds enhances inhibition of spore germination. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-140-3-623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.