Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 572

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classification of rhizobia based on nodC and nifH gene analysis reveals a close phylogenetic relationship among Phaseolus vulgaris symbionts The GenBank accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are AF217261 through AF217272 for nodC and AF218126, AF275670 and AF275671 for nifH.

Laguerre, Gisèle, Nour, Sarah M., Macheret, Valérie, Sanjuan, Juan, Drouin, Pascal, Amarger, Noëlle·2001·Microbiology

Abstract

The nodC and nifH genes were characterized in a collection of 83 rhizobial strains which represented 23 recognized species distributed in the genera Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Mesorhizobium and Bradyrhizobium, as well as unclassified rhizobia from various host legumes. Conserved primers were designed from available nucleotide sequences and were able to amplify nodC and nifH fragments of about 930 bp and 780 bp, respectively, from most of the strains investigated. RFLP analysis of the PCR products resulted in a classification of these rhizobia which was in general well-correlated with their known host range and independent of their taxonomic status. The nodC and nifH fragments were sequenced for representative strains belonging to different genera and species, most of which originated from Phaselous vulgaris nodules. Phylogenetic trees were constructed and revealed close relationships among symbiotic genes of the Phaseolus symbionts, irrespective of their 16S-rDNA-based classification. The nodC and nifH phylogenies were generally similar, but cases of incongruence were detected, suggesting that genetic rearrangements have occurred in the course of evolution. The results support the view that lateral genetic transfer across rhizobial species and, in some instances, across Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium genera plays a role in diversification and in structuring the natural populations of rhizobia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/00221287-147-4-981

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Laguerre, G., Nour, S. M., Macheret, V., Sanjuan, J., Drouin, P., & Amarger, N.
Venue
Microbiology
Published
2001-04-01
Volume
147
Issue
4
Pages
981-993
ISSN
  • 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2080
OpenAlex
W2151996682
Cited by
572
References
1
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of rhizobia based on nodC and nifH gene analysis reveals a close phylogenetic relationship among Phaseolus vulgaris symbionts The GenBank accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are AF217261 through AF217272 for nodC and AF218126, AF275670 and AF275671 for nifH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-147-4-981
The paper
Laguerre, G., Nour, S. M., Macheret, V., Sanjuan, J., Drouin, P., & Amarger, N. (2001). Classification of rhizobia based on nodC and nifH gene analysis reveals a close phylogenetic relationship among Phaseolus vulgaris symbionts The GenBank accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are AF217261 through AF217272 for nodC and AF218126, AF275670 and AF275671 for nifH. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-147-4-981

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.