The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Classification of Staphylococci and Micrococci from World-wide Sources
Abstract
A study has been made of 607 cultures of Gram-positive and catalase-positive cocci received from workers and collections in different parts of the world. These cultures were examined for a wide range of morphological and physiological characters and representative cultures were further studied to determine the chemical constituents of the organisms. Five hundred and sixty-four of the cultures received were aerobic members of the Micrococcaceae, and of these 96% were classified in the author's groups and subgroups; a further subgroup was, however, introduced to accommodate the not previously studied pink-pigmented micrococci. It appears that the Gram-positive and catalase-positive cocci are best separated into the genus Staphylococcus and the genus Micrococcus on the ability of members of Staphylococcus to grow and produce acid from glucose anaerobically; six subgroups of staphylococci were recognized and eight of micrococci. The relationship of named species, groups and subgroups to the author's classification was examined; several species and groups of micrococci had been incorrectly classified. Thus, M. denitrificans, M. halodenitri-ficans and M. radiodurans possess characters which suggest that they should be reclassified with the Gram-negative genera and that Abd-El-Malek and Gibson's group IIIB should be classified with the Gram-positive microbacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LYSOSTAPHIN: A NEW BACTERIOLYTIC AGENT FOR THE STAPHYLOCOCCUS
Schindler, C. A., & Schuhardt, V. T. (1964) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.51.3.414 · Cited by 482
Cited by
Kloos, W. E., & Musselwhite, M. S. (1975) · Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1128/am.30.3.381-395.1975 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- BAIRD-PARKER, A. C.
- Venue
- Journal of General Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1965-03-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363-387
- ISSN
- 0022-1287 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169983304
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Classification of Staphylococci and Micrococci from World-wide Sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-38-3-363
- The paper
- BAIRD-PARKER, A. C. (1965). The Classification of Staphylococci and Micrococci from World-wide Sources. Journal of General Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-38-3-363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.