The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Taxonomy of the Aerobic Pseudomonads: Pseudomonas cepacia, P. marginata, P. alliicola and P. caryophylli
Abstract
SUMMARY: On the basis of phenotypic characterization and DNA-DNA homology studies of strains of phytopathogenic Pseudomonas species, it is concluded that P. cepacia is so similar to P. multivorans that the latter name should be regarded as a synonym. On similar grounds, P. alliicola appears to be a synonym of P. marginata. P. caryophylli is a readily distinguishable species. From the DNA-DNA hybridization studies all of these species seem to be related to each other and to the animal pathogens P. pseudomallei and P. mallei.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Taxonomy of the marine, luminous bacteria
Reichelt, J. L., & Baumann, P. (1973) · Archiv f�r Mikrobiologie · doi:10.1007/bf00769027 · Cited by 320
Palleroni, N. J. (2015) · Bergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria · doi:10.1002/9781118960608.gbm01210 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- BALLARD, R. W., PALLERONI, N. J., DOUDOROFF, M., STANIER, R. Y., & MANDEL, M.
- Venue
- Journal of General Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1970-02-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-214
- ISSN
- 0022-1287 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067347565
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 49.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taxonomy of the Aerobic Pseudomonads: Pseudomonas cepacia, P. marginata, P. alliicola and P. caryophylli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-60-2-199
- The paper
- BALLARD, R. W., PALLERONI, N. J., DOUDOROFF, M., STANIER, R. Y., & MANDEL, M. (1970). Taxonomy of the Aerobic Pseudomonads: Pseudomonas cepacia, P. marginata, P. alliicola and P. caryophylli. Journal of General Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-60-2-199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
