Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Autoradiographic Study of Hyphal Growth of Some Fungi

GOODAY, G. W.·1971·Journal of General Microbiology

Abstract

Incorporation of radioactive glucose and N-acetyl glucosamine into the walls of growing fungal hyphae has been studied using light microscopic autoradiography. Autoradiographs of Phytophthora parasitica with glucose as substrate and Neurospora crassa and Schizophyllum commune with glucose or N-acetyl glucosamine as substrate show that most of the incorporation after incubation times as short as 1 min. is at the extreme hyphal tip. N-Acetyl glucosamine is incorporated less into the subapical region than glucose, and N. crassa shows less subapical incorporation of both substrates than the other two fungi.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/00221287-67-2-125

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
GOODAY, G. W.
Venue
Journal of General Microbiology
Published
1971-08-01
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
125-133
ISSN
0022-1287 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169666637
Cited by
195
References
0
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Autoradiographic Study of Hyphal Growth of Some Fungi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-67-2-125
The paper
GOODAY, G. W. (1971). An Autoradiographic Study of Hyphal Growth of Some Fungi. Journal of General Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-67-2-125

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.