The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of "Humanised" Milks and Supplemented Breast Feeding on The Faecal Flora of Infants
Abstract
SUMMARY Faecal specimens from 47 babies were examined each week during the first 6 weeks of life. Thirteen infants received breast milk alone, nine received Cow and Gate Premium milk, 10 received Scientific Milk Adaptation Gold Cap milk, and 15 received breast milk and in the first week of life a supplement of modified cows’ milk. An acetate buffer was demonstrated in the faeces of >60% of breast-fed infants during the first 4 weeks of life. No buffer was demonstrated in the faeces of either bottle-fed group over the same period. Only 20% of breast-fed infants receiving a supplement produced an acetate buffer in the 1st week, but this figure increased to 60% by the 4th week. Breast-fed babies produced faeces with a low pH (5.1–5.4), high counts of bifidobacteria and low counts of coliforms, bacteroides and clostridia; with the exception of acetic acid there was a notable absence of most volatile fatty acids from these faeces. Infants fed Premium milk produced faeces with a high pH (5.9-8.0) and a relatively high bifidobacterial count in the 1st week; thereafter no bacterial species predominanted. A wide variety of volatile fatty acids was present in these infants’ faeces. Infants fed Gold Cap milk produced faeces with a high pH (6.4–8.2) and a wide variety of volatile fatty acids; the counts of coliform bacilli and putrefactive bacteria were high, whilst counts of bifidobacteria were low. Breast-fed infants who received a supplement in the 1st week produced acid faeces, but the pH was higher than that of infants fed breast milk alone; the bacterial flora was putrefactive for the first 2 weeks but gradually became fermentative, and whilst several volatile fatty acids were detected in the faeces in the 1st week they gradually decreased during the following 5 weeks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Developmental microbial ecology of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract
Mackie, R. I., Sghir, A., & Gaskins, H. R. (1999) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/69.5.1035s · Cited by 1,360
Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: approaches for modulating the microbial ecology of the gut
Collins, M. D., & Gibson, G. R. (1999) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/69.5.1052s · Cited by 912
Stark, P. L., & Lee, A. (1982) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00222615-15-2-189 · Cited by 616
Benno, Y., Sawada, K., & Mitsuoka, T. (1984) · Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.1984.tb00754.x · Cited by 438
Development of Intestinal Transport Function in Mammals
Pácha, J. (2000) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1633 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- BULLEN, C. L., TEARLE, P. V., & STEWART, M. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1977-11-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-413
- ISSN
- 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-5644
- OpenAlex
- W2110999606
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of "Humanised" Milks and Supplemented Breast Feeding on The Faecal Flora of Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00222615-10-4-403
- The paper
- BULLEN, C. L., TEARLE, P. V., & STEWART, M. G. (1977). The Effect of "Humanised" Milks and Supplemented Breast Feeding on The Faecal Flora of Infants. Journal of Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-10-4-403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.