The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Petrimonas sulfuriphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic fermentative bacterium isolated from a biodegraded oil reservoir
Abstract
A mesophilic, anaerobic, fermentative bacterium, strain BN3 T, was isolated from a producing well of a biodegraded oil reservoir in Canada. Cells were Gram-negative, non-motile rods that did not form spores. The temperature range for growth was 15–40 °C, with optimum growth at 37–40 °C. The strain grew with up 4 % NaCl, with optimum growth in the absence of NaCl. Tryptone was required for growth. Yeast extract and elemental sulfur stimulated growth. Growth was also enhanced during fermentation of glucose, arabinose, galactose, maltose, mannose, rhamnose, lactose, ribose, fructose, sucrose, cellobiose, lactate, mannitol and glycerol. Acetate, hydrogen and CO 2 were produced during glucose fermentation. Elemental sulfur and nitrate were used as electron acceptors and were reduced to sulfide and ammonium, respectively. The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 40·8 mol%. Phylogenetic analyses of the 16S rRNA gene sequence indicated that the strain was a member of the phylum ‘Bacteroidetes’, distantly related to the genera Bacteroides and Tannerella(similarity values of less than 90 %). The chemotaxonomic data (fatty acids, polar lipids and quinones composition) also indicated that strain BN3 T could be clearly distinguished from its closest cultivated relatives. This novel organism possesses phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic traits that do not allow its classification as a member of any previously described genus; therefore, it is proposed that this isolate should be described as a member of a novel species of a new genus,Petrimonas gen. nov., of which Petrimonas sulfuriphila sp. nov. is the type species. The type strain is BN3 T(=DSM 16547 T=JCM 12565 T).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Cited by
Wang, P., Wang, H., Qiu, Y., Ren, L., & Jiang, B. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.152 · Cited by 518
Xie, Z., Wang, Z., Wang, Q., Zhu, C., & Wu, Z. (2014) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.014 · Cited by 273
Chen, Z., Rao, Y., Usman, M., Chen, H., Białowiec, A., Zhang, S., & Luo, G. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146077 · Cited by 71
Wang, C., Zuo, J., Chen, X., Xing, W., Xing, L., Li, P., Lu, X., & Li, C. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2014.06.035 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Grabowski, A., Tindall, B. J., Bardin, V., Blanchet, D., & Jeanthon, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2005-05-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1113-1121
- ISSN
- 1466-5026 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-5034
- OpenAlex
- W2125201984
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Petrimonas sulfuriphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic fermentative bacterium isolated from a biodegraded oil reservoir. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/ijs.0.63426-0
- The paper
- Grabowski, A., Tindall, B. J., Bardin, V., Blanchet, D., & Jeanthon, C. (2005). Petrimonas sulfuriphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic fermentative bacterium isolated from a biodegraded oil reservoir. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63426-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.