The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reclassification of Bacteroides distasonis, Bacteroides goldsteinii and Bacteroides merdae as Parabacteroides distasonis gen. nov., comb. nov., Parabacteroides goldsteinii comb. nov. and Parabacteroides merdae comb. nov.
Abstract
The characteristics of three Bacteroides species,Bacteroides distasonis,Bacteroides goldsteinii and Bacteroides merdae, were examined. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that B. distasonis,B. goldsteinii and B. merdae should not be classified as species within the genus Bacteroides. Although B. distasonis,B. goldsteinii and B. merdae were phylogenetically related to Tannerella forsythensis, the ratios of anteiso-C 15 : 0 to iso-C 15 : 0 in whole-cell methanolysates of the three species were different from that of T. forsythensis. In addition, whereas the major menaquinones of T. forsythensis were MK-10 and MK-11, the major menaquinones of B. distasonis,B. goldsteinii and B. merdae were MK-9 and MK-10. The three species were phenotypically similar to Bacteroides sensu stricto, but phylogenetically distinct. Furthermore,B. distasonis,B. goldsteinii and B. merdae could be differentiated from Bacteroides sensu stricto(predominant menaquinones: MK-10 and MK-11) by the menaquinone composition. This is an important chemotaxonomic characteristic of the three species. On the basis of these data, a novel genus,Parabacteroides gen. nov., is proposed for B. distasonis,B. goldsteinii and B. merdae, with three species,Parabacteroides distasonis gen. nov., comb. nov. (the type species),Parabacteroides goldsteinii comb. nov. and Parabacteroides merdae comb. nov. The type strains of P. distasonis,P. goldsteinii and P. merdae are JCM 5825 T(=CCUG 4941 T=DSM 20701 T=ATCC 8503 T), JCM 13446 T(=CCUG 48944 T) and JCM 9497 T(=CCUG 38734 T=ATCC 43184 T), respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Cited by
Oliphant, K., & Allen-Vercoe, E. (2019) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-019-0704-8 · Cited by 1,327
Lawley, T. D., Clare, S., Walker, A. W., Stares, M. D., Connor, T. R., Raisen, C., Goulding, D., Rad, R., Schreiber, F., Brandt, C., et al. (2012) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002995 · Cited by 540
Tracking heavy water (D 2 O) incorporation for identifying and sorting active microbial cells
Berry, D., Mader, E., Lee, T. K., Woebken, D., Wang, Y., Zhu, D., Palatinszky, M., Schintlmeister, A., Schmid, M. C., Hanson, B. T., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1420406112 · Cited by 455
Nagy, E., Urbán, E., & Nord, C. E. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03256.x · Cited by 277
Nagy-Szakal, D., Barupal, D. K., Lee, B., Che, X., Williams, B. L., Kahn, E. J. R., Ukaigwe, J. E., Bateman, L., Klimas, N. G., Komaroff, A. L., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28477-9 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Sakamoto, M., & Benno, Y.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2006-07-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1599-1605
- ISSN
- 1466-5026 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-5034
- OpenAlex
- W2125678015
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reclassification of Bacteroides distasonis, Bacteroides goldsteinii and Bacteroides merdae as Parabacteroides distasonis gen. nov., comb. nov., Parabacteroides goldsteinii comb. nov. and Parabacteroides merdae comb. nov. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/ijs.0.64192-0
- The paper
- Sakamoto, M., & Benno, Y. (2006). Reclassification of Bacteroides distasonis, Bacteroides goldsteinii and Bacteroides merdae as Parabacteroides distasonis gen. nov., comb. nov., Parabacteroides goldsteinii comb. nov. and Parabacteroides merdae comb. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64192-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
