CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Desulfovibrio marinus sp. nov., a moderately halophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from marine sediments in Tunisia

Ben Dhia Thabet, O., Fardeau, M.-L., Suarez-Nuñez, C., Hamdi, M., Thomas, P., Ollivier, B., Alazard, D.·2007·International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.64790-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Two novel sulfate-reducing bacterial strains, designated E-2 T and IMP-2, were isolated from geographically distinct locations. Strain E-2 T was recovered from marine sediments near Sfax (Tunisia), whereas strain IMP-2 originated from oilfield production fluids in the Gulf of Mexico. Cells were Gram-negative, non-sporulated, motile, vibrio-shaped or sigmoid. They were strictly anaerobic, mesophilic and moderately halophilic. Sulfate, sulfite, thiosulfate and elemental sulfur served as electron acceptors, but not nitrate or nitrite. H 2 (with acetate as carbon source), formate, fumarate, lactate, malate, pyruvate, succinate and fructose were used as electron donors in the presence of sulfate as terminal electron acceptor. Lactate was oxidized incompletely to acetate. Fumarate and pyruvate were fermented. Desulfoviridin and c-type cytochromes were present. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of the two strains showed that they were phylogenetically similar (99.0 % similarity) and belonged to the genus Desulfovibrio, with Desulfovibrio indonesiensis and Desulfovibrio gabonensis as their closest phylogenetic relatives. The G+C content of the DNA was respectively 60.4 and 62.7 mol% for strains E-2 T and IMP-2. DNA–DNA hybridization experiments revealed that the novel strains had a high genomic relatedness, suggesting that they belong to the same species. We therefore propose that the two isolates be affiliated to a novel species of the genus Desulfovibrio, Desulfovibrio marinus sp. nov. The type strain is strain E-2 T (=DSM 18311 T =JCM 14040 T).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/ijs.0.64790-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Balch, 1979, Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group, Microbiol Rev, 43, 260, 10.1128/MMBR.43.2.260-296.1979 · DOI
  2. Birkeland, 2005, Sulfate-reducing bacteria and archaea, 35
  3. Campbell, 1966, Desulfovibrio africanus sp. nov., a new dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacterium, J Bacteriol, 92, 1122, 10.1128/JB.92.4.1122-1127.1966 · DOI
  4. Cashion, 1977, A rapid method for the base ratio determination of bacterial DNA, Anal Biochem, 81, 461, 10.1016/0003-2697(77)90720-5 · DOI
  5. Castro, 2000, Phylogeny of sulfate-reducing bacteria, FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 31, 1
  6. Crolet, 2005, Microbial corrosion in the oil industry, 143
  7. Dang, 1996, Desulfovibrio vietnamensis sp. nov., a halophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium from Vietnamese oil fields, Anaerobe, 2, 385, 10.1006/anae.1996.0049 · DOI
  8. De Ley, 1970, The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates, Eur J Biochem, 12, 133, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1970.tb00830.x · DOI
  9. Escara, 1980, Thermal stability and renaturation of DNA in dimethyl sulfoxide solutions: acceleration of the renaturation rate, Biopolymers, 19, 1315, 10.1002/bip.1980.360190708 · DOI
  10. Esnault, 1988, Characterization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp. nov., a sulfate reducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastal lagoon, Syst Appl Microbiol, 10, 147, 10.1016/S0723-2020(88)80029-8 · DOI
  11. Fauque, 2004, Anaerobes: the sulfate-reducing bacteria as an example of metabolic diversity, 169
  12. Feio, 1998, Isolation and characterisation of a novel sulphate-reducing bacterium of the Desulfovibrio genus, Anaerobe, 4, 117, 10.1006/anae.1997.0142 · DOI
  13. Hall, 1999, BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT, Nucleic Acids Symp Ser, 41, 95
  14. Hungate, 1969, A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes, Methods Microbiol, 3B, 117, 10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70503-8 · DOI
  15. Huß, 1983, Studies on the spectrophotometric determination of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates, Syst Appl Microbiol, 4, 184, 10.1016/S0723-2020(83)80048-4 · DOI
  16. Jahnke, 1992, basic computer program for evaluation of spectroscopic DNA renaturation data from Gilford System 2600 spectrophotometer on a PC/XT/AT type personal computer, J Microbiol Methods, 15, 61, 10.1016/0167-7012(92)90069-G · DOI
  17. Le Gall, 1963, A new species of Desulfovibrio, J Bacteriol, 86, 1120, 10.1128/JB.86.5.1120-1120.1963 · DOI
  18. Magot, 2005, Indigenous microbial community in oil fields, 21
  19. Magot, 1992, Desulfovibrio longus sp. nov., a sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from an oil-producing well, Int J Syst Bacteriol, 42, 398, 10.1099/00207713-42-3-398 · DOI
  20. Magot, 2004, Desulfovibrio bastinii sp. nov. and Desulfovibrio gracilis sp. nov., moderately halophilic, sulfate-reducing bacteria isolated from deep subsurface oilfield water, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 54, 1693, 10.1099/ijs.0.02977-0 · DOI
  21. Maidak, 2001, The RDP-II (Ribosomal Database Project), Nucleic Acids Res, 29, 173, 10.1093/nar/29.1.173 · DOI
  22. Miranda-Tello, 2003, Desulfovibrio capillatus sp. nov., a long-chained sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from Gulf of Mexico oil well, Anaerobe, 9, 97, 10.1016/S1075-9964(03)00064-7 · DOI
  23. Postgate, 1984, The Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria
  24. Reichenbecher, 1997, Desulfovibrio inopinatus , sp. nov., a new sulfate-reducing bacterium that degrades hydroxyhydroquinone (1,2,4-trihydroxybenzene), Arch Microbiol, 168, 338, 10.1007/s002030050507 · DOI
  25. Stackebrandt, 1995, Taxonomic relationships, 49, 10.1007/978-1-4899-1582-5_3 · DOI
  26. Tardy-Jacquenod, 1996, Desulfovibrio gabonensis sp. nov., a new moderately halophilic, sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from an oil pipeline, Int J Syst Bacteriol, 46, 710, 10.1099/00207713-46-3-710 · DOI
  27. van der Maarel, 1996, Cleavage of dimethylsulfoniopropionate and reduction of acrylate by Desulfovibrio acrylicus sp. nov, Arch Microbiol, 166, 109, 10.1007/s002030050363 · DOI
  28. Vance, 2005, Reservoir souring: mechanisms and prevention, 123
  29. Wayne, 1987, International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics, Int J Syst Bacteriol, 37, 463, 10.1099/00207713-37-4-463 · DOI
  30. Weisburg, 1991, 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study, J Bacteriol, 173, 697, 10.1128/JB.173.2.697-703.1991 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ben Dhia Thabet, O., Fardeau, M.-L., Suarez-Nuñez, C., Hamdi, M., Thomas, P., Ollivier, B., & Alazard, D.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire d'Ecologie et de Technologie Microbienne, INSAT, 1080 Tunis, Tunisia
  • Laboratoire de Microbiologie IRD, UMR 180, Universités de Provence et de la Méditerranée, ESIL, Case 925, 163 Avenue de Luminy, 13288 Marseille cedex 9, France
  • Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo, Programa de Biotecnología del Petróleo, 07730 México DF, Mexico
Venue
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
Publisher
Microbiology Society
Published
2007-09-01
Volume
57
Issue
9
Pages
2167-2170
ISSN
  • 1466-5026
  • 1466-5034
DOI
10.1099/ijs.0.64790-0
Cited by
32
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review