The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa
Abstract
The higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria were proposed and described in 1997. At each rank, the taxa were delineated from each other solely on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence phylogenetic clustering and taxon-specific 16S rRNA signature nucleotides. In the past 10 years, many novel members have been assigned to this class while, at the same time, some members have been reclassified. The new 16S rRNA gene sequence information and the changes in phylogenetic positions of some taxa influence decisions about which 16S rRNA nucleotides to define as taxon-specific. As a consequence, the phylogenetic relationships of Actinobacteria at higher levels may need to be reconstructed. Here, we present new 16S rRNA signature nucleotide patterns of taxa above the family level and indicate the affiliation of genera to families. These sets replace the signatures published in 1997. In addition, Actinopolysporineae subord. nov. and Actinopolysporaceae fam. nov. are proposed to accommodate the genus Actinopolyspora, Kineosporiineae subord. nov. and Kineosporiaceae fam. nov. are proposed to accommodate the genera Kineococcus, Kineosporia and Quadrisphaera, Beutenbergiaceae fam. nov. is proposed to accommodate the genera Beutenbergia, Georgenia and Salana and Cryptosporangiaceae fam. nov. is proposed to accommodate the genus Cryptosporangium. The families Nocardiaceae and Gordoniaceae are proposed to be combined in an emended family Nocardiaceae. Emended descriptions are also proposed for most of the other higher taxa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · Cited by 44,647
Hall, T. A. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Symposium Series · doi:10.14601/phytopathol_mediterr-14998u1.29 · Cited by 38,297
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm092 · Cited by 28,730
MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.
Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817 · Cited by 19,820
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Felsenstein, J. (1989) · Cladistics · Cited by 17,682
Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology
S., F. A., Buchanan, R. E. T., Gibbons, N. E., & Bergey (1975) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1218353 · Cited by 11,333
(1993) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023 · Cited by 11,229
PHYLIP ( PHYLogeny Inference Package)
Cummings, M. P. (2004) · Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · doi:10.1002/9780471650126.dob0534.pub2 · Cited by 3,127
Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli.
Brosius, J., Palmer, M. L., Kennedy, P. J., & Noller, H. F. (1978) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.75.10.4801 · Cited by 2,297
Cited by
Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of the Phylum Actinobacteria
Nouioui, I., Carro, L., García-López, M., Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Woyke, T., Kyrpides, N. C., Pukall, R., Klenk, H.-P., Goodfellow, M., & Göker, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02007 · Cited by 769
Mycetoma: a unique neglected tropical disease
Zijlstra, E. E., van de Sande, W. W. J., Welsh, O., Mahgoub, E. S., Goodfellow, M., & Fahal, A. H. (2016) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00359-x · Cited by 346
MITRA, D., MONDAL, R., KHOSHRU, B., SENAPATI, A., RADHA, T. K., MAHAKUR, B., UNIYAL, N., MYO, E. M., BOUTAJ, H., SIERRA, B. E. G., et al. (2022) · Pedosphere · doi:10.1016/s1002-0160(21)60042-5 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhi, X.-Y., Li, W.-J., & Stackebrandt, E.
- Venue
- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2009-03-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 589-608
- ISSN
- 1466-5026 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-5034
- OpenAlex
- W2147660632
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 41.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/ijs.0.65780-0
- The paper
- Zhi, X.-Y., Li, W.-J., & Stackebrandt, E. (2009). An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65780-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.