Lactobacillus paragasseri sp. nov., a sister taxon of Lactobacillus gasseri, based on whole-genome sequence analyses
Abstract
Three strains, JCM 5343T, JCM 5344 and JCM 1130, currently identified as Lactobacillus gasseri , were investigated using a polyphasic taxonomic approach. Although these strains shared high 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities with L. gasseri ATCC 33323T (99.9 %), they formed a clade clearly distinct from ATCC 33323T based on whole-genome relatedness. The average nucleotide identity and in silico DNA–DNA hybridization values of these three strains compared to L. gasseri ATCC 33323T were 93.4–93.7 and 53.1–54.1 %, respectively, and both were less than the widely accepted threshold to distinguish two species (95 and 70 %, respectively). The three strains were Gram-stain positive, non-motile, non-spore-forming, catalase-negative and rod-shaped bacteria. They grew at 25–45 °C and in the presence of 2.0 % (w/v) NaCl. The major fatty acids of the three strains were C16 : 0 and C18 : 1 ω9c. Based on phylogenetic analyses of the phenylalanyl-tRNA synthase alpha subunit and RNA polymerase alpha subunit genes, and on phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characteristics, strains JCM 5343T, JCM 5344 and JCM 1130 represent a novel species distinct from L. gasseri , for which we propose the name Lactobacillus paragasseri sp. nov. In addition, a large portion of genomes currently labelled as L. gasseri in the public sequence database should be reclassified as L. paragasseri based on whole-genome relatedness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
L. gasseri and L. paragasseri have a very similar profile in vaginal adaptation and high genomic overlap, confirming a close evolutionary relationship.
“We observed a very similar profile in L. gasseri and L. paragasseri in the context of vaginal adaptation. As shown in Fig. 5, the two species have a high genomic overlap, confirming a close evolutionary relationship [41].”
From Women's health is a team effort: probiogenomics supports the development of a multi-species vaginal probiotic (2026) · cites this paper as [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Tanizawa, Y., Tada, I., Kobayashi, H., Endo, A., Maeno, S., Toyoda, A., Arita, M., Nakamura, Y., Sakamoto, M., Ohkuma, M., & Tohno, M.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Genetics (JP)
- 2Department of Genetics, School of Life Science, The Graduate University of Advanced Studies, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan
- National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (JP)
- Tokyo University of Agriculture (JP)
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP)
- RIKEN BioResource Research Center (JP)
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2018-11-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3512-3517
- ISSN
- 1466-5026 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-5034
- OpenAlex
- W2890343612
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H01447, 17K19248)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- Lactobacillus paragasseri, Lactobacillus gasseri
- MeSH terms
- Lactobacillus gasseri, DNA, Bacterial, Fatty Acids, Lactobacillus, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Phylogeny, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Bacterial Typing Techniques, Genome, Bacterial, Sequence Analysis, DNA
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review