Microbiome depiction through user-adapted bioinformatic pipelines and parameters
Open accessAbstract
Graphical Abstract: Determining microbiome composition is a multi-step process. The 16S rRNA gene is amplified from the extracted DNA, sequenced, and then metagenomic data are input into a bioinformatic workflow. This paper describes how choices of bioinformatic pipelines, databases, and parameter values, such as maxEE and QTrim, can impact microbial compositional output.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In practice, gut microbiota profiling through 16S rRNA sequencing has become the gold standard for assessing ecological nutritional status.
“In practice, gut microbiota profiling through 16S rRNA sequencing has become the gold standard for assessing ecological nutritional status [78].”
From The Seven Methods for the Evaluation of Nutritional Status—ABCDEFG: Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [78]
The graphical abstract describes 16S rRNA sequencing as a way to determine microbiome composition. The Abstract does not identify it as a gold standard or discuss assessing ecological nutritional status; it instead cautions that 16S-based compositions depend on the bioinformatic pipeline and should be interpreted carefully. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 135 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Nayman, E. I., Schwartz, B. A., Polanco, F. C., Firek, A. K., Gumabong, A. C., Hofstee, N. J., Narasimhan, G., Cickovski, T., & Mathee, K.
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2023-10-12
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-5644
- OpenAlex
- W4387564027
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 135
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Keywords
- microbiome, 16S rRNA, microbial community analysis, bioinformatics pipeline, taxonomic interpretation
- MeSH terms
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Reproducibility of Results, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Computational Biology, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review