Cited by 99Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingAntimicrobial agents and applications

In vitro activity of carvacrol against staphylococcal preformed biofilm by liquid and vapour contact

Nostro, Antonia, Marino, Andreana, Blanco, Anna Rita, Cellini, Luigina, Di Giulio, Mara, Pizzimenti, Francesco, Roccaro, Andrea Sudano, Bisignano, Giuseppe·2009·Journal of Medical Microbiology

Abstract

Carvacrol is an important component of essential oils and recently has attracted much attention as a result of its biological properties, such as a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of carvacrol in liquid and vapour phase on preformed biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis by determining biofilm biomass and cultivable cell numbers, and by using epifluorescence and scanning electron microscopy. Carvacrol was able to reduce biofilm biomass and cell viability more effectively when used with liquid contact rather than with vapour phase. The efficacy of treatment with carvacrol vapour was found to be dependent on exposure time. The predominance of red fluorescence using a LIVE/DEAD BacLight Viability kit (Molecular Probes) and the partially destroyed biofilm architecture as determined by microscopy in treated samples provided evidence for the efficacy of carvacrol. The findings of this investigation suggest a potential application for carvacrol in the inactivation of staphylococcal biofilms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/jmm.0.009274-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Essential oils cause morphological changes in staphylococcal and Listeria biofilms.

    “Nostro et al. [117] and Sandasi et al. [118] described the morphological changes of staphylococcal and Listeria biofilms after exposure to EOs.”

    From Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria (2013) · cites this paper as [117]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 99

Authors
Nostro, A., Marino, A., Blanco, A. R., Cellini, L., Di Giulio, M., Pizzimenti, F., Roccaro, A. S., & Bisignano, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Messina (IT)
  • SIFI Pharma SpA, Catania, Italy
  • University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University ‘G. d'Annunzio’, Chieti, Italy
Venue
Journal of Medical Microbiology
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
791-797
ISSN
  • 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-5644
OpenAlex
W2145033073
Cited by
99
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
carvacrol, essential oils, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, bacterial biofilms, biofilm inactivation, biofilm biomass, cell viability, exposure time
MeSH terms
Cymenes, Culture Media, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Oils, Volatile, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Volatilization, Colony Count, Microbial, Biofilms, Biomass, Monoterpenes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review