The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Crystalline bacterial biofilm formation on urinary catheters by urease-producing urinary tract pathogens: a simple method of control
Abstract
The problem of catheter encrustation stems from infection by urease-producing bacteria. These organisms generate ammonia from urea, elevate the pH of urine and cause crystals of calcium and magnesium phosphates to form in the urine and the biofilm that develops on the catheter. In this study, a laboratory model was used to compare the ability of 12 urease-positive species of urinary tract pathogens to encrust and block catheters. Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris and Providencia rettgeri were able to raise the urinary pH above 8.3 and produce catheter-blocking crystalline biofilms within 40 h. Morganella morganii and Staphylococcus aureus elevated the pH of urine to 7.4 and 6.9, respectively, and caused some crystal deposition in the biofilms but did not block catheters in the 96 h experimental period. Isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Providencia stuartii were only capable of raising the pH of urine to a maximum of 6.4 and failed to cause crystal deposition in the biofilm. The most effective way to prevent catheter encrustation was shown to be diluting urine and increasing its citrate concentration. This strategy raises the nucleation pH (pH n) at which calcium and magnesium phosphates crystallize from urine. Increasing the fluid intake of a healthy volunteer with citrated drinks resulted in urine with a pH n of >8.0 in which catheter encrustation was inhibited. It is suggested that this dietary strategy will be an effective means of controlling catheter encrustation, whichever bacterial species is causing the problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Qin, S., Xiao, W., Zhou, C., Pu, Q., Deng, X., Lan, L., Liang, H., Song, X., & Wu, M. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01056-1 · Cited by 1,703
A review of the recent advances in antimicrobial coatings for urinary catheters
Singha, P., Locklin, J., & Handa, H. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.070 · Cited by 448
Spatio-temporal assembly of functional mineral scaffolds within microbial biofilms
Oppenheimer-Shaanan, Y., Sibony-Nevo, O., Bloom-Ackermann, Z., Suissa, R., Steinberg, N., Kartvelishvily, E., Brumfeld, V., & Kolodkin-Gal, I. (2016) · npj Biofilms and Microbiomes · doi:10.1038/npjbiofilms.2015.31 · Cited by 131
“One fascinating example is calcite precipitation in Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris and Providencia rettgeri where crystal deposition in their biofilms blocks catheters.(15,16) Importantly, the physiological role of mineral deposits within biofilms remains to be determined.”
BackgroundResultColletta, A., Wu, J., Wo, Y., Kappler, M., Chen, H., Xi, C., & Meyerhoff, M. E. (2015) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00032 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Broomfield, R. J., Morgan, S. D., Khan, A., & Stickler, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2009-10-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1367-1375
- ISSN
- 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-5644
- OpenAlex
- W2158573840
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crystalline bacterial biofilm formation on urinary catheters by urease-producing urinary tract pathogens: a simple method of control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/jmm.0.012419-0
- The paper
- Broomfield, R. J., Morgan, S. D., Khan, A., & Stickler, D. J. (2009). Crystalline bacterial biofilm formation on urinary catheters by urease-producing urinary tract pathogens: a simple method of control. Journal of Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.012419-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.