The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The LuxR receptor: the sites of interaction with quorum-sensing signals and inhibitors
Open accessAbstract
The function of LuxR homologues as quorum sensors is mediated by the binding of N-acyl-l-homoserine lactone (AHL) signal molecules to the N-terminal receptor site of the proteins. In this study, site-directed mutagenesis was carried out of the amino acid residues comprising the receptor site of LuxR from Vibrio fischeri, and the ability of the L42A, L42S, Y62F, W66F, D79N, W94D, V109D, V109T and M135A LuxR mutant proteins to activate green fluorescent protein expression from a P luxI promoter was measured. X-ray crystallographic studies of the LuxR homologue TraR indicated that residues Y53 and W57 form hydrogen bonds to the 1-carbonyl group and the ring carbonyl group, respectively, of the cognate AHL signal. Based on the activity and signal specificity of the LuxR mutant proteins, and on molecular modelling, a model is suggested in which Y62 (corresponding to Y53 in TraR) forms a hydrogen bond with the ring carbonyl group rather than the 1-carbonyl group, while W66 (corresponding to W57 in TraR) forms a hydrogen bond to the 1-carbonyl group. This flips the position of the acyl side chain in the LuxR/signal molecule complex compared to the TraR/signal molecule complex. Halogenated furanones from the marine alga Delisea pulchra and the synthetic signal analogue N-(sulfanylacetyl)-l-homoserine lactone can block quorum sensing. The LuxR mutant proteins were insensitive to inhibition by N-(propylsulfanylacetyl)-l-homoserine lactone. In contrast, the mutations had only a minor effect on the sensitivity of the proteins to halogenated furanones, and the data strongly suggest that these compounds do not compete in a ‘classic’ way with N-3-oxohexanoyl-l-homoserine lactone for the binding site. Based on modelling and experimental data it is suggested that these compounds bind in a non-agonist fashion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections
Bjarnsholt, T. (2013) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/apm.12099 · Cited by 1,080
Targeting virulence: can we make evolution-proof drugs?
Allen, R. C., Popat, R., Diggle, S. P., & Brown, S. P. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3232 · Cited by 532
Mini-review: quorum sensing in the marine environment and its relationship to biofouling
Dobretsov, S., Teplitski, M., & Paul, V. (2009) · Biofouling · doi:10.1080/08927010902853516 · Cited by 388
Paczkowski, J. E., Mukherjee, S., McCready, A. R., Cong, J.-P., Aquino, C. J., Kim, H., Henke, B. R., Smith, C. D., & Bassler, B. L. (2017) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m116.770552 · Cited by 319
Fleitas Martínez, O., Cardoso, M. H., Ribeiro, S. M., & Franco, O. L. (2019) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2019.00074 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Koch, B., Liljefors, T., Persson, T., Nielsen, J., Kjelleberg, S., & Givskov, M.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3589-3602
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W1986415167
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The LuxR receptor: the sites of interaction with quorum-sensing signals and inhibitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/mic.0.27954-0
- The paper
- Koch, B., Liljefors, T., Persson, T., Nielsen, J., Kjelleberg, S., & Givskov, M. (2005). The LuxR receptor: the sites of interaction with quorum-sensing signals and inhibitors. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27954-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.