Cited by 5Prion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsTrypanosoma species research and implications

HEPES Inhibits the Conversion of Prion Protein in Cell Culture

Delmouly, Karine, Belondrade, Maxime, Casanova, Danielle, Milhavet, Ollivier, Lehmann, Sylvain·2011·Journal of General Virology

Abstract

HEPES is a well-known buffering reagent used in cell-culture medium. Interestingly, this compound is also responsible for significant modifications of biological parameters such as uptake of organic molecules, alteration of oxidative stress mechanisms or inhibition of ion channels. While using cell-culture medium supplemented with HEPES on prion-infected cells, it was noticed that there was a significant concentration-dependent inhibition of accumulation of the abnormal isoform of the prion protein (PrP(Sc)). This effect was present only in live cells and was thought to be related to modification of the PrP environment or biology. These results could modify the interpretation of cell-culture assays of prion therapeutic agents, as well as of previous cell biology results obtained in the field using HEPES buffers. This inhibitory effect of HEPES could also be exploited to prevent contamination or propagation of prions in cell culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/vir.0.027334-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HEPES activated lysosomal transcription factors in macrophages, inhibited the prion protein conversion in neural stem cells and affected their viability and differentiation.

    “Briefly, HEPES activated lysosomal transcription factors in macrophages (Tol et al., 2018), inhibited the prion protein conversion in neural stem cells and affected their viability and differentiation (Delmouly et al., 2011).”

    From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Delmouly et al., 2011

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 5

Authors
Delmouly, K., Belondrade, M., Casanova, D., Milhavet, O., & Lehmann, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS-UPR 1142, 141 rue de la Cardonille, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
Venue
Journal of General Virology
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
92
Issue
5
Pages
1244-1250
ISSN
  • 0022-1317 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2099
OpenAlex
W2169362407
Cited by
5
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of General Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Trypanosoma species research and implications
Keywords
HEPES, prion protein, PrPSc, prion conversion, cell culture media, prion propagation
MeSH terms
Culture Media, Enzyme Inhibitors, HEPES, Prions, Protein Folding, Cell Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review