Cited by 14Fractal and DNA sequence analysisGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesAlgorithms and Data Compression

Sequence Comparison Alignment-Free Approach Based on Suffix Tree and L-Words Frequency

Open access
Soares, Inês, Goios, Ana, Amorim, António·2012·The Scientific World Journal

Abstract

The vast majority of methods available for sequence comparison rely on a first sequence alignment step, which requires a number of assumptions on evolutionary history and is sometimes very difficult or impossible to perform due to the abundance of gaps (insertions/deletions). In such cases, an alternative alignment-free method would prove valuable. Our method starts by a computation of a generalized suffix tree of all sequences, which is completed in linear time. Using this tree, the frequency of all possible words with a preset length L—L-words—in each sequence is rapidly calculated. Based on the L-words frequency profile of each sequence, a pairwise standard Euclidean distance is then computed producing a symmetric genetic distance matrix, which can be used to generate a neighbor joining dendrogram or a multidimensional scaling graph. We present an improvement to word counting alignment-free approaches for sequence comparison, by determining a single optimal word length and combining suffix tree structures to the word counting tasks. Our approach is, thus, a fast and simple application that proved to be efficient and powerful when applied to mitochondrial genomes. The algorithm was implemented in Python language and is freely available on the web.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1100/2012/450124

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Lwords algorithm is primarily used for data compression, enabling efficient storage and transmission of repetitive data.

    “This algorithm is primarily used for data compression, enabling efficient storage and transmission of repetitive data [21].”

    From Whole-Genome Alignment: Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Introduction and Methods (§2.1; page not provided) describe the algorithm as an alignment-free method for comparing DNA sequences and calculating genetic distances, not as a data-compression algorithm. Methods §2.1.1 notes lower memory requirements for its suffix-tree structure, but does not present efficient storage or transmission of repetitive data as its purpose. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [1]Bandelt HJ Macaulay V Richards M Median networks: speedy construction and greedy reduction, one simulation, and two case studies from human mtDNA Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2000 16 1 8 28 2-s2.0-0033928911 10877936
  2. [2]Wu M Eisen JA A simple, fast, and accurate method of phylogenomic inference Genome Biology 2008 9 10, article R151 2-s2.0-55649110049 PMC2760878 18851752
  3. [3]Homer N Merriman B Nelson SF BFAST: an alignment tool for large scale genome resequencing PLoS ONE 2009 4 11 2-s2.0-70450177746 e7767 PMC2770639 19907642
  4. [4]Angiuoli SV Salzberg SL Mugsy: fast multiple alignment of closely related whole genomes Bioinformatics 2011 27 3 334 342 2-s2.0-79551599525 btq665 21148543 PMC3031037
  5. [5]Vinga S Almeida J Alignment-free sequence comparison—a review Bioinformatics 2003 19 4 513 523 2-s2.0-0037342499 12611807
  6. [6]Edgar RC MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput Nucleic Acids Research 2004 32 5 1792 1797 2-s2.0-3042666256 15034147 PMC390337
  7. [7]Sims GE Jun SR Wu GA Kim SH Alignment-free genome comparison with feature frequency profiles (FFP) and optimal resolutions Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009 106 8 2677 2682 2-s2.0-62449130191 19188606 PMC2634796
  8. [8]Costa AM Machado JT Quelhas MD Histogram-based DNA analysis for the visualization of chromosome, genome and species information Bioinformatics 2011 27 9 1207 1214 2-s2.0-79954541766 21398672
  9. [9]Domazet-Lošo M Haubold B Efficient estimation of pairwise distances between genomes Bioinformatics 2009 25 24 3221 3227 2-s2.0-75849146491 btp590 19825795
  10. [10]Gusfield D Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences: Computer Science and Computer Biology 1997 New York, NY, USA Cambridge University Press
  11. [11]Schulz MH Bauer S Robinson PN The generalised κ-truncated suffix tree for time-and space-efficient searches in multiple DNA or protein sequences International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications 2008 4 1 81 95 2-s2.0-39449128278 18283030
  12. [12]Carrigan MA Uryasev O Davis RP Zhai L Hurley TD Benner SA The natural history of class I primate alcohol dehydrogenases includes gene duplication, gene loss, and gene conversion PLoS ONE 2012 7 7 e41175 2-s2.0-84864418969 PMC3409193 22859968

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soares, I., Goios, A., & Amorim, A.
Affiliations
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Soares, Inês
Venue
The Scientific World Journal
Published
2012
Volume
2012
Pages
1-4
ISSN
1537-744X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073001584
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Scientific World JOURNAL (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/43646/2008, PEST-C/MAT/UI0144/2011)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
alignment-free sequence comparison, suffix trees, word counting, genetic distance, mitochondrial genome, neighbor-joining, multidimensional scaling
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Base Sequence, DNA, Mitochondrial, Phylogeny, Primates, Software, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Computational Biology, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review