The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Harmful Freshwater Algal Blooms, With an Emphasis on Cyanobacteria
Open accessAbstract
Suspended algae, or phytoplankton, are the prime source of organic matter supporting food webs in freshwater ecosystems. Phytoplankton productivity is reliant on adequate nutrient supplies; however, increasing rates of nutrient supply, much of it manmade, fuels accelerating primary production or eutrophication. An obvious and problematic symptom of eutrophication is rapid growth and accumulations of phytoplankton, leading to discoloration of affected waters. These events are termed blooms. Blooms are a prime agent of water quality deterioration, including foul odors and tastes, deoxygenation of bottom waters (hypoxia and anoxia), toxicity, fish kills, and food web alterations. Toxins produced by blooms can adversely affect animal (including human) health in waters used for recreational and drinking purposes. Numerous freshwater genera within the diverse phyla comprising the phytoplankton are capable of forming blooms; however, the blue-green algae (or cyanobacteria) are the most notorious bloom formers. This is especially true for harmful toxic, surface-dwelling, scum-forming genera (e.g., Anabaena, Aphanizomenon, Nodularia, Microcystis) and some subsurface bloom-formers (Cylindrospermopsis, Oscillatoria) that are adept at exploiting nutrient-enriched conditions. They thrive in highly productive waters by being able to rapidly migrate between radiance-rich surface waters and nutrient-rich bottom waters. Furthermore, many harmful species are tolerant of extreme environmental conditions, including very high light levels, high temperatures, various degrees of desiccation, and periodic nutrient deprivation. Some of the most noxious cyanobacterial bloom genera (e.g., Anabaena, Aphanizomenon, Cylindrospermopsis, Nodularia) are capable of fixing atmospheric nitrogen (N2), enabling them to periodically dominate under nitrogen-limited conditions. Cyanobacteria produce a range of organic compounds, including those that are toxic to higher-ranked consumers, from zooplankton to further up the food chain. Both N2- and non-N2-fixing genera participate in mutualistic and symbiotic associations with microorganisms, higher plants, and animals. These associations appear to be of great benefit to their survival and periodic dominance. In this review, we address the ecological impacts and environmental controls of harmful blooms, with an emphasis on the ecology, physiology, and management of cyanobacterial bloom taxa. Combinations of physical, chemical, and biotic features of natural waters function in a synergistic fashion to determine the sensitivity of water bodies. In waters susceptible to blooms, human activities in water- and airsheds have been linked to the extent and magnitudes of blooms. Control and management of cyanobacterial and other phytoplankton blooms invariably includes nutrient input constraints, most often focused on nitrogen (N) and/or phosphorus (P). The types and amount of nutrient input constraints depend on hydrologic, climatic, geographic, and geologic factors, which interact with anthropogenic and natural nutrient input regimes. While single nutrient input constraints may be effective in some water bodies, dual N and P input reductions are usually required for effective long-term control and management of harmful blooms. In some systems where hydrologic manipulations (i.e., plentiful water supplies) are possible, reducing the water residence time by enhanced flushing and artificial mixing (in conjunction with nutrient input constraints) can be particularly effective alternatives. Implications of various management strategies, based on combined ecophysiological and environmental considerations, are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes
Potts, M. (1994) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.58.4.755-805.1994 · Cited by 1,382
Cited by
The rise of harmful cyanobacteria blooms: the potential roles of eutrophication and climate change
O’Neil, J. M., Davis, T. W., Burford, M. A., & Gobler, C. J. (2012) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.027 · Cited by 2,225
Frangeul, L., Quillardet, P., Castets, A.-M., Humbert, J.-F., Matthijs, H. C., Cortez, D., Tolonen, A., Zhang, C.-C., Gribaldo, S., Kehr, J.-C., et al. (2008) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-274 · Cited by 221
Clark, J. M., Schaeffer, B. A., Darling, J. A., Urquhart, E. A., Johnston, J. M., Ignatius, A. R., Myer, M. H., Loftin, K. A., Werdell, P. J., & Stumpf, R. P. (2017) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.046 · Cited by 184
Comparison of Diatoms and Dinoflagellates from Different Habitats as Sources of PUFAs
Peltomaa, E., Hällfors, H., & Taipale, S. J. (2019) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md17040233 · Cited by 73
Yang, C., Lin, F., Li, Q., Li, T., & Zhao, J. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00394 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Paerl, H. W., Fulton, R. S., Moisander, P. H., & Dyble, J.
- Venue
- The Scientific World JOURNAL
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 76-113
- ISSN
- 1537-744X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075890664
- Cited by
- 1,053
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Harmful Freshwater Algal Blooms, With an Emphasis on Cyanobacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1100/tsw.2001.16
- The paper
- Paerl, H. W., Fulton, R. S., Moisander, P. H., & Dyble, J. (2001). Harmful Freshwater Algal Blooms, With an Emphasis on Cyanobacteria. The Scientific World JOURNAL. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.