PreprintCited by 41Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Control of Hox transcription factor concentration and cell-to-cell variability by an auto-regulatory switch

Open access
Papadopoulos, Dimitrios K., Skouloudaki, Kassiani, Engstrom, Ylva, Terenius, Lars, Rigler, Rudolf, Zechner, Christoph, Vukojevic, Vladana, Tomancak, Pavel·2017·Development

Preprint — published as 10.1242/dev.168179 · Paper page

Abstract

The variability in transcription factor concentration among cells is an important developmental determinant, yet how variability is controlled remains poorly understood. Studies of variability have focused predominantly on monitoring mRNA production noise. Little information exists about transcription factor protein variability, since this requires the use of quantitative methods with single-molecule sensitivity. Using Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS), we characterised the concentration and variability of 14 endogenously tagged TFs in live Drosophila imaginal discs. For the Hox TF Antennapedia we investigated whether protein variability results from random stochastic events or is developmentally regulated. We found that Antennapedia transitioned from low concentration/high variability early, to high concentration/low variability later, in development. FCS and temporally resolved genetic studies uncovered that Antp itself is necessary and sufficient to drive a developmental regulatory switch from auto-activation to auto-repression, thereby reducing variability. This switch is controlled by progressive changes in relative concentrations of preferentially activating and repressing Antennapedia isoforms, which bind chromatin with different affinities. Mathematical modelling demonstrated that the experimentally supported auto-regulatory circuit can explain the increase of Antennapedia concentration and suppression of variability over time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/115220

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Papadopoulos, D. K., Skouloudaki, K., Engstrom, Y., Terenius, L., Rigler, R., Zechner, C., Vukojevic, V., & Tomancak, P.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
  • Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (DE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Center for Systems Biology Dresden (DE)
Corresponding author
Papadopoulos, Dimitrios K.
Venue
Development
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2017-03-14
Volume
146
Issue
12
ISSN
0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950674378
Cited by
41
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Federation of European Biochemical Societies
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (138700)
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
Hox transcription factors, Antennapedia, transcription factor concentration, cell-to-cell variability, auto-activation, developmental gene regulation, Drosophila imaginal discs, transcriptional noise, mathematical modeling of gene regulation
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Binding Sites, Chromatin, Drosophila melanogaster, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Female, Genes, Homeobox, Genotype, Homozygote, Male, Models, Biological, Models, Theoretical, Phenotype, Protein Binding, RNA, Messenger, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Stochastic Processes, Transcription Factors, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Transgenes, Protein Isoforms, Drosophila Proteins, Antennapedia Homeodomain Protein, Imaginal Discs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review