Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 66Environmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesFish Ecology and Management StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Lateral and longitudinal fish eDNA distribution in dynamic riverine habitats

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1002/edn3.171 · Paper page

Abstract

Assessing the status and distribution of fish populations in rivers is essential for management and conservation efforts in these dynamic habitats. Currently, methods detecting environmental DNA (eDNA) are being established as an alternative and/or complementary approach to the traditional monitoring of fish species. In lotic systems, a sound understanding of hydrological conditions and their influence on the local target detection probability and DNA quantity is key for the interpretation of eDNA-based results. However, the effect of seasonal and diurnal changes in discharge and the comparability of semi-quantitative results between species remain hardly addressed. We conducted a cage experiment with four fish species (three salmonid and one cyprinid species) in a glacier-fed, fish-free river in Tyrol (Austria) during summer, fall, and winter discharge situations (i.e. 25-fold increase from winter to summer). Each season, water samples were obtained on three consecutive days at 13 locations downstream of the cages including lateral sampling every 1-2 m across the wetted width. Fish eDNA was quantified by species-specific endpoint PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis. Close to the cages, lateral eDNA distribution was heterogenous and mirrored cage placement within the stream. In addition to the diluting effect of increased discharge, longitudinal signal changes within the first 20 m were weakest at high discharge. For downstream locations with laterally homogenous eDNA distribution, the signals decreased significantly with increasing distance and discharge. Generally, the eDNA of the larger-bodied salmonid species was less frequently detected, and signal strengths were lower compared to the cyprinid species. This study exemplifies the importance of hydrological conditions for the interpretation of eDNA-based data across seasons. To control for heterogenous eDNA distribution and enable comparisons over time, sampling schemes in lotic habitats need to incorporate hydrological conditions and species traits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.05.28.120147

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 69 · Cited by 66

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Aarts, B. G. W. , & Nienhuis, P. H. (2003). Fish zonations and guilds as the basis for assessment of ecological integrity of large rivers. In Aquatic Biodiversity (pp. 157–178). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1084-9_11 · DOI
  2. 2015, Trends in the hydrologic regime of Alpine rivers, Journal of Hydrology, 529, 1823, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.052 · DOI
  3. 2016, The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics, Conservation Genetics, 17, 1, 10.1007/s10592-015-0775-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2020, Spatial and temporal patterns of environmental DNA detection to inform sampling protocols in lentic and lotic systems, Ecology and Evolution, 10, 1602, 10.1002/ece3.6014 · DOI
  5. 2020, Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects, Biodiversity and Conservation, 29, 2089, 10.1007/s10531-020-01980-0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2018, Supervised Multiblock Analysis in R with the ade4 Package, Journal of Statistical Software, 86, 1
  7. 10.1038/nature11148 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2019, Using environmental DNA sampling to monitor the invasion of nonnative Esox lucius (northern pike) in the Columbia River basin, USA, Environmental DNA, 1, 215, 10.1002/edn3.22 · DOI
  9. 2004, The ade4 Package – I: One-Table Methods, R News, 4, 5
  10. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00337.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Deiner, K. , & Altermatt, F. (2014). Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river. PLOS ONE, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088786 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2017, Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities, Molecular Ecology, 26, 5872, 10.1111/mec.14350 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Deiner, K. , Fronhofer, E. A. , Mächler, E. , Walser, J. C. , & Altermatt, F. (2016). Environmental DNA reveals that rivers are conveyer belts of biodiversity information. Nature Communications, 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12544 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2017, Environmental DNA analysis for estimating the abundance and biomass of stream fish, Freshwater Biology, 62, 30, 10.1111/fwb.12846 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/03632415.2017.1276329 · DOI
  16. Faraway, J. J. (2016). Extending the Linear Model with R. Generalized Linear, Mixed Effects and Nonparametric Regression Models (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315382722 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2011, The role of anthropogenic vs. natural in-stream structures in determining connectivity and genetic diversity in an endangered freshwater fish, Macquarie perch (Macquaria australasica), Evolutionary Applications, 4, 589, 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00183.x · DOI
  18. Fette, M. , Weber, C. , Peter, A. , & Wehrli, B. (2007). Hydropower production and river rehabilitation: A case study on an alpine river. Environmental Modeling & Assessment. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-006-9061-7 · DOI
  19. 2019, Stream Transport and Retention of Environmental DNA Pulse Releases in Relation to Hydrogeomorphic Scaling Factors, Environmental Science and Technology, 53, 6640, 10.1021/acs.est.8b06829 · DOI
  20. Freyhof, J. , & Kottelat, M. (2007). Handbook of European freshwater fishes. In Ichthyological Research (Vol. 55). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-007-0012-3 · DOI
  21. Hagenaars, J. A. , & McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Applied Latent Calss Analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied Latent Class Analysis. Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  22. 2019, Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds, Hydrobiologia, 826, 25, 10.1007/s10750-018-3750-5 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/fwb.13197 · DOI
  24. Harrison, J. B. , Sunday, J. M. , & Rogers, S. M. (2019). Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 286. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1409 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2018, Performance of eDNA assays to detect and quantify an elusive benthic fish in upland streams, Biological Invasions, 20, 3079, 10.1007/s10530-018-1760-x · DOI
  26. 2015, Distance, flow and PCR inhibition: EDNA dynamics in two headwater streams, Molecular Ecology Resources, 15, 216, 10.1111/1755-0998.12285 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2019, Essential biodiversity variables for mapping and monitoring species populations, Nature Ecology and Evolution, 3, 539, 10.1038/s41559-019-0826-1 · DOI
  28. 2016, Estimating fish abundance and biomass from eDNA concentrations: variability among capture methods and environmental conditions, Molecular Ecology Resources, 16, 1401, 10.1111/1755-0998.12522 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Laporte, M. , Bougas, B. , Côté, G. , Champoux, O. , Paradis, Y. , Morin, J. , & Bernatchez, L. (2020). Caged fish experiment and hydrodynamic bidimensional modeling highlight the importance to consider 2D dispersion in fluvial environmental DNA studies. Environmental DNA, edn3.88. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.88 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.025 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 2019, Environmental DNA for the enumeration and management of Pacific salmon, Molecular Ecology Resources, 19, 597, 10.1111/1755-0998.12987 · DOI
  32. Maruyama, A. , Nakamura, K. , Yamanaka, H. , Kondoh, M. , & Minamoto, T. (2014). The release rate of environmental DNA from juvenile and adult fish. PLoS ONE, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114639 · DOI
  33. Pont, D. , Rocle, M. , Valentini, A. , Civade, R. , Jean, P. , Maire, A. , … Dejean, T. (2018). Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28424-8 · DOI
  34. 2019, Effect of artificial barriers on the distribution of the invasive signal crayfish and Chinese mitten crab, Scientific Reports, 9, 1
  35. 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.009 · DOI
  36. 2020, Fishing for mammals: Landscape-level monitoring of terrestrial and semi-aquatic communities using eDNA from riverine systems, Journal of Applied Ecology, 57, 707, 10.1111/1365-2664.13592 · DOI
  37. 2015, Long-term ecological patterns of alpine streams: An imprint of glacial legacies, Limnology and Oceanography, 60, 992, 10.1002/lno.10069 · DOI
  38. Settele, J. , Scholes, R. , Betts, R. A. , Bunn, S. , Leadley, P. , Nepstad, D. , … Winter, M. (2015). Terrestrial and Inland water systems. In Climate Change 2014 Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects (pp. 271–360). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415379.009 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Shogren, A. J. , Tank, J. L. , Andruszkiewicz, E. , Olds, B. , Mahon, A. R. , Jerde, C. L. , & Bolster, D. (2017). Controls on eDNA movement in streams: Transport, Retention, and Resuspension /704/158/2464 /704/242 /45/77 article. Scientific Reports, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05223-1 · DOI
  40. 2012, Advances in multiplex PCR: Balancing primer efficiencies and improving detection success, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 898, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00215.x · DOI
  41. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035868 · DOI
  42. 2016, Molecular prey identification in Central European piscivores, Molecular Ecology Resources, 16, 123, 10.1111/1755-0998.12436 · DOI
  43. Thalinger, B. , Pütz, Y. , & Traugott, M. (2020). Endpoint PCR coupled with capillary electrophoresis (celPCR) provides sensitive and quantitative measures of environmental DNA in singleplex and multiplex reactions. BioRxiv, 2020.10.24.353730. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.24.353730 · DOI
  44. Thalinger, B. , Wolf, E. , Traugott, M. , & Wanzenböck, J. (2019). Monitoring spawning migrations of potamodromous fish species via eDNA. Scientific Reports, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51398-0 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.030 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 2019, Downstream transport and seasonal variation in freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) eDNA concentration, Environmental DNA, 1, 64, 10.1002/edn3.10 · DOI
  48. 2007, Reshaping Data with the reshape Package, Journal of Statistical Software, 21, 1
  49. Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Retrieved from https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org · DOI · Paper page
  50. 2015, Environmental DNA particle size distribution from Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), Conservation Genetics Resources, 7, 639, 10.1007/s12686-015-0465-z · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.023 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Willett, S. D. , McCoy, S. W. , Taylor Perron, J. , Goren, L. , & Chen, C. Y. (2014). Dynamic reorganization of River Basins. Science, 343(6175). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248765 · DOI
  53. 2007, Flow velocity and the hydrologic behavior of streams during baseflow, Geophysical Research Letters, 34, L24404
  54. Wood, Z. T. , Erdman, B. F. , York, G. , Trial, J. G. , & Kinnison, M. T. (2020). Experimental assessment of optimal lotic eDNA sampling and assay multiplexing for a critically endangered fish. Environmental DNA, edn3.64. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.64 · DOI
  55. Yates, M. C. , Wilcox, T. M. , McKelvey, K. S. , Young, M. K. , Schwartz, M. K. , & Derry, A. M. (2020). Allometric scaling of eDNA production in stream-dwelling brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) inferred from population size structure. Environmental DNA, edn3.150. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.150 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Thalinger, B., Kirschner, D., Pütz, Y., Moritz, C., Schwarzenberger, R., Wanzenböck, J., & Traugott, M.
Affiliations
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Corresponding author
Thalinger, Bettina
Venue
Environmental DNA
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-05-30
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
305-318
ISSN
2637-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112053409
Cited by
66
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental DNA (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (853219)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
river discharge, hydrological conditions, salmonids, Cyprinidae, seasonal variation, diurnal variation, sampling design, species-specific detection, glacial streams, fish monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lateral and longitudinal fish eDNA distribution in dynamic riverine habitats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/2020.05.28.120147
The paper
Thalinger, B., Kirschner, D., Pütz, Y., Moritz, C., Schwarzenberger, R., Wanzenböck, J., & Traugott, M. (2020). Lateral and longitudinal fish eDNA distribution in dynamic riverine habitats. Environmental DNA. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.120147

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.