PreprintCited by 25Cell Image Analysis TechniquesAI in cancer detectionSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

In situ classification of cell types in human kidney tissue using 3D nuclear staining

Open access
Woloshuk, Andre, Khochare, Suraj, Almulhim, Aljohara Fahad, McNutt, Andrew, Dean, Dawson, Barwinska, Daria, Ferkowicz, Michael, Eadon, Michael T. +5 more·2020·Cytometry Part A

Abstract

To understand the physiology and pathology of disease, capturing the heterogeneity of cell types within their tissue environment is fundamental. In such an endeavor, the human kidney presents a formidable challenge because its complex organizational structure is tightly linked to key physiological functions. Advances in imaging-based cell classification may be limited by the need to incorporate specific markers that can link classification to function. Multiplex imaging can mitigate these limitations, but requires cumulative incorporation of markers, which may lead to tissue exhaustion. Furthermore, the application of such strategies in large scale 3-dimensional (3D) imaging is challenging. Here, we propose that 3D nuclear signatures from a DNA stain, DAPI, which could be incorporated in most experimental imaging, can be used for classifying cells in intact human kidney tissue. We developed an unsupervised approach that uses 3D tissue cytometry to generate a large training dataset of nuclei images (NephNuc), where each nucleus is associated with a cell type label. We then devised various supervised machine learning approaches for kidney cell classification and demonstrated that a deep learning approach outperforms classical machine learning or shape-based classifiers. Specifically, a custom 3D convolutional neural network (NephNet3D) trained on nuclei image volumes achieved a balanced accuracy of 80.26%. Importantly, integrating NephNet3D classification with tissue cytometry allowed in situ visualization of cell type classifications in kidney tissue. In conclusion, we present a tissue cytometry and deep learning approach for in situ classification of cell types in human kidney tissue using only a DNA stain. This methodology is generalizable to other tissues and has potential advantages on tissue economy and non-exhaustive classification of different cell types.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.06.24.167726

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TissueMNIST is a 2D dataset based on BBBC051, containing 236,386 human kidney cortex cells organized into 8 categories.

    “We use the BBBC05128, available from the Broad Bioimage Benchmark Collection29. The dataset contains 236,386 human kidney cortex cells, segmented from 3 reference tissue specimens and organized into 8 categories.”

    From MedMNIST v2 - A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classification (2023) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Data organization section describes approximately 230,000 nuclei from three reference tissue specimens, and the Results describe eight classification categories and derived 2D datasets. The copy does not give the exact count of 236,386 or identify the dataset as TissueMNIST or BBBC051; it says the dataset would be made available through an online repository such as the Broad Bioimage Benchmark Collection. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Nawata, C.M. & Pannabecker, T.L. Mammalian urine concentration: a review of renal medullary architecture and membrane transporters. J Comp Physiol B 188, 899-918 (2018).
  2. Taal, M.W., Brenner, B.M. & Rector, F.C. Brenner & Rector's the kidney, (Elsevier/Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 2012).
  3. Lake, B.B., et al. A single-nucleus RNA-sequencing pipeline to decipher the molecular anatomy and pathophysiology of human kidneys. Nat Commun 10, 2832 (2019).
  4. Janowczyk, A. & Madabhushi, A. Deep learning for digital pathology image analysis: A comprehensive tutorial with selected use cases. J Pathol Inform 7, 29 (2016).
  5. Qi, Q., et al. Label-Efficient Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 23, 2108-2116 (2019).
  6. Stoltzfus, C.R., et al. CytoMAP: A Spatial Analysis Toolbox Reveals Features of Myeloid Cell Organization in Lymphoid Tissues. Cell Rep 31, 107523 (2020).
  7. Carpenter, A.E., et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7, R100 (2006).
  8. Eulenberg, P., et al. Reconstructing cell cycle and disease progression using deep learning. Nat Commun 8, 463 (2017).
  9. Ljosa, V., Sokolnicki, K.L. & Carpenter, A.E. Annotated high-throughput microscopy image sets for validation. Nat Methods 9, 637 (2012).
  10. Medyukhina, A., et al. Dynamic spherical harmonics approach for shape classification of migrating cells. Sci Rep 10, 6072 (2020).
  11. Riordan, D.P., Varma, S., West, R.B. & Brown, P.O. Automated Analysis and Classification of Histological Tissue Features by Multi-Dimensional Microscopic Molecular Profiling. PLoS One 10, e0128975 (2015).
  12. Dunn, K.W., et al. DeepSynth: Three-dimensional nuclear segmentation of biological images using neural networks trained with synthetic data. Sci Rep 9, 18295 (2019).
  13. Kumar, N., et al. A Dataset and a Technique for Generalized Nuclear Segmentation for Computational Pathology. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36, 1550-1560 (2017).
  14. Rohde, G.K. New methods for quantifying and visualizing information from images of cells: An overview. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013, 121-124 (2013).
  15. Holzinger, A., Langs, G., Denk, H., Zatloukal, K. & Muller, H. Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 9, e1312 (2019).
  16. Pedregosa, F., et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. in arXiv e-prints arXiv:1201.0490 (2012). · arXiv
  17. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. arXiv 1512.03385(2015). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woloshuk, A., Khochare, S., Almulhim, A. F., McNutt, A., Dean, D., Barwinska, D., Ferkowicz, M., Eadon, M. T., Kelly, K. J., Dunn, K. W., Hasan, M. A., El-Achkar, T. M., & Winfree, S.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Winfree, Seth
Venue
Cytometry Part A
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-06-24
Volume
99
Issue
7
Pages
707-721
ISSN
1552-4922 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109598412
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cytometry Part A (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ralph W. and Grace M. Showalter Research Trust Fund
  • National Institutes of Health (DK079312)
  • School of Medicine, Indiana University
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T35HL110854)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K08DK107864, P30DK079312, R01DK091623)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
kidney cell types, DAPI staining, 3D convolutional neural networks, human kidney tissue
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Supervised Machine Learning, Humans, Kidney, Staining and Labeling, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review