PreprintCited by 328Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Rapid and efficient in vivo astrocyte-to-neuron conversion with regional identity and connectivity?

Open access
Wang, Lei-Lei, Garcia, Carolina Serrano, Zhong, Xiaoling, Ma, Shuaipeng, Zhang, Chun-Li·2020·Cell

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.005 · Paper page

Abstract

In vivo reprogramming of glia into functional neurons emerges as potential regeneration-based therapeutics for neural injuries or neurological diseases. Recent studies show that AAV-based manipulation of certain factors can rapidly and highly efficiently convert resident glia into functional neurons with brain region-specificity and precise connectivity. Using NEUROD1 as an example, we here show that the presumed astrocytes-converted neurons are essentially endogenous neurons in the adult mouse brain. AAV-mediated co-expression of NEUROD1 and a reporter indeed specifically, rapidly, and efficiently induces numerous reporter-labeled neurons. However, these neurons cannot be traced back to quiescent or reactive astrocytes by using stringent lineage-mapping strategies. Conversely, reporter-labeled neurons cannot be detected when NEUROD1 is strictly expressed in adult brain astrocytes. Through a retrograde labeling approach, our results rather reveal that endogenous neurons are the cell source for NEUROD1-induced reporter-labeled neurons. These results underline the indispensable value of stringent lineage-tracing strategies and beg for cautious interpretation of the in vivo reprogramming phenomena.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.08.16.253195

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An unresolved controversy is whether the apparent generation of new neurons from astrocytes in earlier reports may actually reflect endogenous neuronal precursors or mature neurons mistakenly labeled by various fluorescent marking schemes, as opposed to transdifferentiation from glia.

    “An unresolved controversy41 is whether the apparent generation of new neurons from astrocytes in earlier reports7 may actually reflect endogenous neuronal precursors or mature neurons mistakenly labeled by various fluorescent marking schemes, as opposed to transdifferentiation from glia.”

    From Therapeutically viable generation of neurons with antisense oligonucleotide suppression of PTB (2021) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Introduction and Discussion (pages unavailable) report that endogenous neurons can be mislabeled as astrocyte-converted neurons by less stringent reporter methods, supporting the mature-neuron alternative. Our copy does not establish that the apparent new neurons instead came from endogenous neuronal precursors. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Smith, D.K., Wang, L., and Zhang, C.L. (2016). Physiological, pathological, and engineered cell identity reprogramming in the central nervous system. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 5 , 499-517. Smith, D.K., and Zhang, C.L. (2015). Regeneration through reprogramming adult cell identity in vivo. Am J Pathol 185 , 2619-2628.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, L.-L., Garcia, C. S., Zhong, X., Ma, S., & Zhang, C.-L.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Lei-Lei
  • Zhang, Chun-Li
Venue
Cell
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-08-17
Volume
184
Issue
21
Pages
5465-5481.e16
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3203538421
Cited by
328
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 3
FWCI
21.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Welch Foundation (I‐1724)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS117065, R01NS111776, R01NS092616, R01NS088095, R01NS099073)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
astrocyte-to-neuron conversion, lineage tracing, retrograde tracing, NeuroD1, PTBP1, reactive astrocytes, cell fate conversion, brain regeneration, mouse brain
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Astrocytes, Brain, Brain Injuries, Cell Differentiation, Gene Expression Regulation, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Down-Regulation, Genes, Reporter, Homeodomain Proteins, Cell Lineage, Integrases, Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins, Polypyrimidine Tract-Binding Protein, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review