Clinical, cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging findings in COVID-19 encephalopathy: a case series
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To describe the clinical, neurological, neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings associated with encephalopathy in patients admitted to a COVID-19 tertiary reference center. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of consecutive patients with COVID-19 evaluated by a consulting neurology team from March 30, 2020 through May 15, 2020. Results: Fifty-five patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 were included, 43 of whom showed encephalopathy, and were further divided into mild, moderate and severe encephalopathy groups. Nineteen patients (44%) had undergone mechanical ventilation and received intravenous sedatives. Eleven (26%) patients were on dialysis. Laboratory markers of COVID-19 severity were very common in encephalopathy patients, but did not correlate with the severity of encephalopathy. Thirty-nine patients underwent neuroimaging studies, which showed mostly non-specific changes. One patient showed lesions possibly related to CNS demyelination. Four had suffered an acute stroke. SARS-CoV-2 was detected by RT-PCR in only one of 21 CSF samples. Two CSF samples showed elevated white blood cell count and all were negative for oligoclonal bands. In our case series the severity of encephalopathy correlated with higher probability of death during hospitalization (OR = 5.5 for each increment in the degree of encephalopathy, from absent (0) to mild (1), moderate (2) or severe (3), p<0.001). Conclusion: In our consecutive series with 43 encephalopathy cases, neuroimaging and CSF analysis did not support the role of direct viral CNS invasion or CNS inflammation as the cause of encephalopathy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies on cognitive changes following SARS-CoV-2 infection focused on acute changes, mainly acute encephalopathy.
“Most studies on cognitive changes following SARS-CoV-2 infection focused on acute changes, mainly acute encephalopathy [137–139].”
From Cognitive decline following acute viral infections: literature review and projections for post-COVID-19 (2022) · cites this paper as [137]
Most cases of COVID-associated neurological symptoms are CSF-RT-PCR-negative, including encephalopathic patients.
“SARS-CoV-2 RNA, however, is rarely identified in CSF samples of COVID-19 patients [158], and most cases of COVID-associated neurological symptoms are CSF-RT-PCR-negative, including encephalopathic patients [128, 137, 159].”
From Cognitive decline following acute viral infections: literature review and projections for post-COVID-19 (2022) · cites this paper as [137]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Tuma, R., Guedes, B., Carra, R., Iepsen, B., Rodrigues, J., Camelo-Filho, A. E., Kubota, G., Ferrari, M., Neto, A. S., Oku, M. H. M., Terrim, S., Lopes, C. C. B., Passos Neto, C. E. B., Fiorentino, M. D., Souza, J. C. C., Baima, J. P. S., Silva, T., Perissinotti, I., Martin, M. D. G. M., Gonçalves, M., Fortini, I., Smid, J., Adoni, T., Lucato, L., Nitrini, R., Gomes, H., & Castro, L. H.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Tuma, Raphael
- ORCID
- Tuma, Raphael
- Guedes, Bruno
- Carra, Rafael
- Iepsen, Bruno
- Rodrigues, Júlia
- Camelo-Filho, Antonio Edvan
- Kubota, Gabriel
- Ferrari, Maíra
- Neto, Adalberto Studart
- Oku, Mariana Hiromi Manoel
- Terrim, Sara
- Lopes, Cesar Castello Branco
- Passos Neto, Carlos E. B.
- Fiorentino, Matheus D.
- Souza, Julia C. C.
- Baima, José Pedro S.
- Silva, Tomás
- Perissinotti, Iago
- Martin, Maria da Graça M.
- Gonçalves, Marcia
- Fortini, Ida
- Smid, Jerusa
- Adoni, Tarso
- Lucato, Leandro
- Nitrini, Ricardo
- Gomes, Helio
- Castro, Luiz H
- Venue
- Neurological Sciences
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2020-09-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 479-489
- ISSN
- 1590-1874 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7787933
- OpenAlex
- W3120174357
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, neuroimaging findings, central nervous system demyelination, acute stroke, encephalopathy severity, mortality, mechanical ventilation, dialysis, oligoclonal bands
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain Diseases, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Hospital Mortality, Tertiary Care Centers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review