PreprintCited by 143Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Multi-cellular communities are perturbed in the aging human brain and Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Cain, Anael, Taga, Mariko, McCabe, Cristin, Green, Gilad, Hekselman, Idan, White, Charles C., Lee, Dylan I., Gaur, Pallavi +9 more·2020·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The role of different cell types and their interactions in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an open question. Here we pursued it by assembling a high-resolution cellular map of the aging frontal cortex by single nucleus RNA-seq of 24 individuals with different clinicopathologic characteristics. We used the map to infer the neocortical cellular architecture of 638 individuals profiled by bulk RNA-seq, providing the sample size necessary for identifying statistically robust associations. We uncovered diverse cell populations associated with AD, including inhibitory neuronal subtypes and oligodendroglial states. We further recovered a network of multicellular communities, each composed of coordinated subpopulations of neuronal, glial and endothelial cells, and found that two of these communities are altered in AD. Finally, we used mediation analyses to prioritize cellular changes that might contribute to cognitive decline. Thus, our deconstruction of the aging neocortex provides a roadmap for evaluating the cellular microenvironments underlying AD and dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.12.22.424084

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have shown that RORB-expressing excitatory neurons in the EC and the frontal cortex, as well as SST-positive interneurons in the frontal cortex, are more prone to neuronal susceptibility than other parts of the brain.

    “Studies have shown that RORB-expressing excitatory neurons in the EC [45] and the frontal cortex [56], as well as SST-positive interneurons in the frontal cortex [8], are more prone to neuronal susceptibility than other parts of the brain.”

    From Abnormal accumulation of extracellular vesicles in hippocampal dystrophic axons and regulation by the primary cilia in Alzheimer's disease (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

    The ‘Cell population frequencies’ section reports that SST-positive inhibitory neurons were relatively more common in healthy individuals and says this suggests potential vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease. The study examines the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, but it does not show that these neurons are more vulnerable than neurons in other brain regions. Citation [8] is attached to the SST-positive interneuron clause, not the RORB claims. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 143

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yang, A. C. et al. A human brain vascular atlas reveals diverse cell mediators of Alzheimer's disease risk. bioRxiv (2021).

Authors
Cain, A., Taga, M., McCabe, C., Green, G., Hekselman, I., White, C. C., Lee, D. I., Gaur, P., Rozenblatt-Rosen, O., Zhang, F., Yeger-Lotem, E., Bennett, D. A., Yang, H.-S., Regev, A., Menon, V., Habib, N., & De Jager, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Menon, Vilas
  • Habib, Naomi
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-12-23
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1267-1280
ISSN
1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381189833
Cited by
143
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 2
FWCI
10.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Rush University
  • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
  • Israel Science Foundation (1709/19)
  • Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG017917, U01AG046152, R01AG015819, P30AG010161, U01AG061356, R21AG075754, R01AG066831, RF1AG057473, RF1AG036042, U54AG076040, P30AG072975)
  • H2020 European Research Council (853409)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, brain aging, frontal cortex, somatostatin interneurons, oligodendrocytes, endothelial cells, glial cells, cognitive decline, dementia, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, cell-cell interactions
MeSH terms
Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Neocortex, Endothelial Cells, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review