PreprintCited by 6Mosquito-borne diseases and controlSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVirology and Viral Diseases

A mRNA-LNP vaccine against Dengue Virus elicits robust, serotype-specific immunity

Open access
Wollner, Clayton J., Richner, Michelle, Hassert, Mariah A., Pinto, Amelia K., Brien, James D., Richner, Justin M.·2021·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Dengue virus (DENV) is the most common vector-borne viral disease with nearly 400 million worldwide infections each year concentrated in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Severe dengue complications are often associated with a secondary heterotypic infection of one of the four circulating serotypes. In this scenario, humoral immune responses targeting cross-reactive, poorly-neutralizing epitopes can lead to increased infectivity of susceptible cells via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). In this way, antibodies produced in response to infection or vaccination are capable of contributing to enhanced disease in subsequent infections. Currently, there are no available therapeutics to combat DENV disease, and there is an urgent need for a safe and efficacious vaccine. Here, we developed a nucleotide-modified mRNA vaccine encoding for the membrane and envelope structural proteins from DENV serotype 1 encapsulated into lipid nanoparticles (prM/E mRNA-LNP). Vaccination of mice elicited robust antiviral immune responses comparable to viral infection with high levels of neutralizing antibody titers and antiviral CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. Immunocompromised AG129 mice vaccinated with the prM/E mRNA-LNP vaccine were protected from a lethal DENV challenge. Vaccination with either a wild-type vaccine, or a vaccine with mutations in the immunodominant fusion-loop epitope, elicited equivalent humoral and cell mediated immune responses. Neutralizing antibodies elicited by the vaccine were sufficient to protect against a lethal challenge. Both vaccine constructs demonstrated serotype specific immunity with minimal serum cross-reactivity and reduced ADE compared to a live DENV1 viral infection. IMPORTANCE: With 400 million worldwide infections each year, dengue is the most common vector-born viral disease. 40% of the world’s population is at risk with dengue experiencing consistent geographic spread over the years. With no therapeutics available and vaccines performing sub optimally, the need for an effective dengue vaccine is urgent. Here we develop and characterize a novel mRNA vaccine encoding for the dengue serotype 1 envelope and premembrane structural proteins that is delivered via a lipid nanoparticle. Our DENV1 prM/E mRNA-LNP vaccine induces neutralizing antibody and cellular immune responses in immunocompetent mice and protects an immunocompromised mouse from a lethal DENV challenge. Existing antibodies against dengue can enhance subsequent infections via antibody-dependent enhancement. Importantly our vaccine only induced serotype specific immune responses and did not induce ADE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.01.05.425517

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies revealed significant differences in protein expression levels of target antigens when different signal peptides are selected.

    “Furthermore, previous studies revealed significant differences in protein expression levels of target antigens when different signal peptides are selected.93”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 6

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pierson TC, Diamond MS. 2013. Chapter 26 FlavivirusesFields virology. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.

Authors
Wollner, C. J., Richner, M., Hassert, M. A., Pinto, A. K., Brien, J. D., & Richner, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Richner, Justin M.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-01-06
OpenAlex
W3119380419
Cited by
6
References
53
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
dengue virus, mRNA vaccines, lipid nanoparticles, serotype-specific immunity, antibody-dependent enhancement, neutralizing antibodies, cell-mediated immunity, immunodeficient mice, dengue vaccine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review