Robust spike antibody responses and increased reactogenicity in seropositive individuals after a single dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine
Open accessAbstract
An important question is arising as COVID-19 vaccines are getting rolled out: Should individuals who already had a SARS-CoV-2 infection receive one or two shots of the currently authorized mRNA vaccines. In this short report, we show that the antibody response to the first vaccine dose in individuals with pre-existing immunity is equal to or even exceeds the titers found in naïve individuals after the second dose. We also show that the reactogenicity is significantly higher in individuals who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the past. Changing the policy to give these individuals only one dose of vaccine would not negatively impact on their antibody titers, spare them from unnecessary pain and free up many urgently needed vaccine doses.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vaccines have increased immunogenicity in individuals with past infection and these people have higher antibody titres than those without previous infection.
“It has been shown that vaccines have increased immunogenicity in individuals with past infection and these people have higher antibody titres than those without previous infection.22, 23, 25”
From Vaccine side-effects and SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in users of the COVID Symptom Study app in the UK: a prospective observational study (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine
Polack, F. P., Thomas, S. J., Kitchin, N., Absalon, J., Gurtman, A., Lockhart, S., Perez, J. L., Pérez Marc, G., Moreira, E. D., Zerbini, C., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2034577 · Cited by 14,592 · see citing works
Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
Baden, L. R., El Sahly, H. M., Essink, B., Kotloff, K., Frey, S., Novak, R., Diemert, D., Spector, S. A., Rouphael, N., Creech, C. B., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2035389 · Cited by 10,119 · see citing works
SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development
Krammer, F. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2798-3 · Cited by 2,098 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Menni, C., Klaser, K., May, A., Polidori, L., Capdevila, J., Louca, P., Sudre, C. H., Nguyen, L. H., Drew, D. A., Merino, J., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00224-3 · Cited by 1,031 · see citing works
Goel, R. R., Apostolidis, S. A., Painter, M. M., Mathew, D., Pattekar, A., Kuthuru, O., Gouma, S., Hicks, P., Meng, W., Rosenfeld, A. M., et al. (2021) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.abi6950 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Walls, A. C., Miranda, M. C., Schäfer, A., Pham, M. N., Greaney, A., Arunachalam, P. S., Navarro, M.-J., Tortorici, M. A., Rogers, K., O’Connor, M. A., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.015 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
“We show that receiving a third immunization, even of an unaltered vaccine, improves the neutralizing Ab responses to VOCs, which is reminiscent of what has been shown in vaccinated humans previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 (Abu Jabal et al., 2021; Krammer et al., 2021; Stamatatos et al., 2021), suggesting that furthe…”
COVID-19: people who have had infection might only need one dose of mRNA vaccine
Wise, J. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n308 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krammer, F., Srivastava, K., the PARIS team, & Simon, V.
- Affiliations
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Corresponding author
- Krammer, Florian
- Simon, Viviana
- ORCID
- Krammer, Florian
- Venue
- medRxiv
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-02-01
- OpenAlex
- W3127450935
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 73
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- JPB Foundation (2020-215611, HHSN272201400008C, 75N93019C00051, 2020-215611 [5384))
- Open Philanthropy Project (#2020-215611, 75N93019C00051, HHSN272201400008C)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201400008C), 2020-215611 (5384, CEIRS, contract # HHSN272201400008C, 75N93019C00051, 2020-215611)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
- Keywords
- COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, COVID-19 vaccination, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, seropositive individuals, vaccine reactogenicity, booster vaccination, antibody titers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review