PreprintCited by 116SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyImmune responses and vaccinations

Robust spike antibody responses and increased reactogenicity in seropositive individuals after a single dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine

Open access
Krammer, Florian, Srivastava, Komal, the PARIS team, Simon, Viviana·2021·medRxiv

Abstract

An important question is arising as COVID-19 vaccines are getting rolled out: Should individuals who already had a SARS-CoV-2 infection receive one or two shots of the currently authorized mRNA vaccines. In this short report, we show that the antibody response to the first vaccine dose in individuals with pre-existing immunity is equal to or even exceeds the titers found in naïve individuals after the second dose. We also show that the reactogenicity is significantly higher in individuals who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the past. Changing the policy to give these individuals only one dose of vaccine would not negatively impact on their antibody titers, spare them from unnecessary pain and free up many urgently needed vaccine doses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.01.29.21250653

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krammer, F., Srivastava, K., the PARIS team, & Simon, V.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
  • Krammer, Florian
  • Simon, Viviana
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-02-01
OpenAlex
W3127450935
Cited by
116
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 73
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • JPB Foundation (2020-215611, HHSN272201400008C, 75N93019C00051, 2020-215611 [5384))
  • Open Philanthropy Project (#2020-215611, 75N93019C00051, HHSN272201400008C)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201400008C), 2020-215611 (5384, CEIRS, contract # HHSN272201400008C, 75N93019C00051, 2020-215611)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, COVID-19 vaccination, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, seropositive individuals, vaccine reactogenicity, booster vaccination, antibody titers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review