PreprintCited by 104Vaccine Coverage and HesitancySARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchHealthcare Systems and Challenges

Association of demographic and occupational factors with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake in a multi-ethnic UK healthcare workforce: a rapid real-world analysis

Open access
Martin, Christopher A., Marshall, Colette, Patel, Prashanth, Goss, Charles, Jenkins, David R., Ellwood, Claire, Barton, Linda, Price, Arthur +3 more·2021·PLoS Medicine

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003823

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) and ethnic minority groups are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection and adverse outcome. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination is now available for frontline UK HCWs; however, demographic/occupational associations with vaccine uptake in this cohort are unknown. We sought to establish these associations in a large UK hospital workforce. Methods: We conducted cross-sectional surveillance examining vaccine uptake amongst all staff at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust. We examined proportions of vaccinated staff stratified by demographic factors, occupation and previous COVID-19 test results (serology/PCR) and used logistic regression to identify predictors of vaccination status after adjustment for confounders. Findings: We included 19,044 HCWs; 12,278 (64.5%) had received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Compared to White HCWs (70.9% vaccinated), a significantly smaller proportion of ethnic minority HCWs were vaccinated (South Asian 58.5%, Black 36.8% p<0.001 for both). After adjustment, factors found to be negatively associated with vaccine uptake were; younger age, female sex, increasing deprivation and belonging to any non-White ethnic group (Black: aOR0.30, 95%CI 0.26–0.34, South Asian:0.67, 0.62–0.72). Those that had previously had confirmed COVID-19 (by PCR) were less likely to be vaccinated than those who had tested negative. Interpretation: Ethnic minority HCWs and those from more deprived areas as well as younger, female staff are less likely to take up SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. These findings have major implications for the delivery of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination programmes in HCWs and the wider population and should inform the national vaccination programme to prevent the disparities of the pandemic from widening. Funding: NIHR, UKRI/MRC

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.02.11.21251548

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, C. A., Marshall, C., Patel, P., Goss, C., Jenkins, D. R., Ellwood, C., Barton, L., Price, A., Brunskill, N. J., Khunti, K., & Pareek, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Khunti, Kamlesh
  • Pareek, Manish
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-02-12
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
e1003823-e1003823
ISSN
1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3209262566
Cited by
104
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 35
FWCI
13.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Gilead Sciences
  • UK Research and Innovation (MR/ V027549/1)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR301192, ACF-2018-11-004, MR/V027549/1)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • University of Leicester (MR/V027549/1)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/V027549/1)
  • NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccination, COVID-19 vaccine uptake, healthcare workers, ethnic minority disparities, socioeconomic deprivation, gender differences, pregnancy, prior COVID-19 infection, hospital staff, vaccine hesitancy
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Delivery of Health Care, United Kingdom, Health Personnel, Humans, Minority Groups, Vaccination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review