PreprintCited by 34SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Coincident rapid expansion of two SARS-CoV-2 lineages with enhanced infectivity in Nigeria

Open access
Ozer, Egon A., Simons, Lacy M., Adewumi, Olubusuyi M., Fowotade, Adeola A., Omoruyi, Ewean C., Adeniji, Johnson A., Dean, Taylor J., Zayas, Janet +8 more·2021·medRxiv

Abstract

The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants with enhanced transmissibility or decreased susceptibility to immune responses is a major threat to global efforts to end the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Disparities in viral genomic surveillance capabilities and efforts have resulted in gaps in our understanding of the viral population dynamics across the globe. Nigeria, despite having the largest population of any nation in Africa, has had relatively little SARS-CoV-2 sequence data made publicly available. Here we report the whole-genome sequences of 74 SARS-CoV-2 isolates collected from individuals in Oyo State, Nigeria in January 2021. Most isolates belonged to either the B.1.1.7 Alpha “variant of concern” or the B.1.525 Eta lineage, which is currently considered a “variant of interest” containing multiple spike protein mutations previously associated with enhanced transmissibility and possible immune escape. Nigeria has the highest reported frequency of the B.1.525 lineage globally with phylogenetic characteristics consistent with a recent monophyletic origin and rapid expansion. Spike protein from the B.1.525 lineage displayed both increased infectivity and decreased neutralization by convalescent sera compared to Spike proteins from other clades. These results, along with indications that the virus is outpacing the B.1.1.7 lineage in Nigeria, suggest that the B.1.525 lineage represents another “variant of concern” and further underline the importance of genomic surveillance in undersampled regions across the globe.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.04.09.21255206

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Eta variant is present at low levels in many countries, with Nigeria having the highest proportion of infections.

    “The Eta variant is present at low levels in many countries, with Nigeria having the highest proportion of infections 236 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 34

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Davies, N.G., et al. Estimated transmissibility and severity of novel SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern 202012/01 in England. medRxiv, 2020.2012.2024.20248822 (2020).

Authors
Ozer, E. A., Simons, L. M., Adewumi, O. M., Fowotade, A. A., Omoruyi, E. C., Adeniji, J. A., Dean, T. J., Zayas, J., Bhimalli, P. P., Ash, M. K., Godzik, A., Schneider, J. R., Mamede, J. I., Taiwo, B. O., Hultquist, J. F., & Lorenzo-Redondo, R.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Hultquist, Judd F.
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-04-17
OpenAlex
W3152773214
Cited by
34
References
75
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Gilead Sciences (COVID-19)
  • Northwestern University (CA060553, P30CA060553)
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance (UL1 TR002389)
  • National Institutes of Health (COVID-19, HHSN272201700060 C, CA-060553, AI135964, UL1TR002389)
  • Quest High Performance Computing
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA060553)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM118187)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (COVID-19, AI117943, K22AI136691, AI135964, HHSN272201700060C, P30AI117943, U19AI135964)
  • Fogarty International Center (D43TW009608)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, B.1.1.7 Alpha variant, variants of concern, variants of interest, spike protein mutations, viral transmissibility, immune evasion, whole genome sequencing, genomic surveillance, Nigeria, Oyo State, monophyletic origin, viral population dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review