Preliminary Analysis of Safety and Immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 Variant Vaccine Booster
Open accessAbstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of a global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that has led to more than 3 million deaths worldwide. Safe and effective vaccines are now available, including the mRNA-1273 prototype vaccine, which encodes for the Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein stabilized in the prefusion conformation by 2 proline substitutions. This vaccine showed 94% efficacy in prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 disease in a phase 3 clinical study. Recently, SARS-CoV-2 variants have emerged, some of which have shown decreased susceptibility to neutralization by vaccine-induced antibody, most notably the B.1.351 variant, although the overall impact on vaccine efficacy remains to be determined. In addition, recent evidence of waning antibody levels after infection or vaccination point to the need for periodic boosting of immunity. Here we present the preliminary evaluation of a clinical study on the use of the prototype mRNA-1273 or modified COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, designed to target emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants as booster vaccines in participants previously vaccinated approximately 6 months earlier with two doses of the prototype vaccine, mRNA-1273. The modified vaccines include a monovalent mRNA-1273.351 encoding for the S protein found in the B.1.351 variant and multivalent mRNA-1273.211 comprising a 1:1 mix of mRNA-1273 and mRNA-1273.351. As single 50 µg booster vaccinations, both mRNA-1273 and mRNA-1273.351 had acceptable safety profiles and were immunogenic. Antibody neutralization titers against B.1.351 and P.1 variants measured by SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization (PsVN) assays before the booster vaccinations, approximately 6 to 8 months after the primary series, were low or below the assay limit of quantification, although geometric mean titers versus the wild-type strain remained above levels likely to be protective. Two weeks after the booster vaccinations, titers against the wild-type original strain, B.1.351, and P.1 variants increased to levels similar to or higher than peak titers after the primary series vaccinations. Although both mRNA-1273 and mRNA-1273.351 boosted neutralization of the wild-type original strain, and B.1.351 and P.1 variants, mRNA-1273.351 appeared to be more effective at increasing neutralization of the B.1.351 virus versus a boost with mRNA-1273. The vaccine trial is ongoing and boosting of clinical trial participants with the multivalent mRNA-1273.211 is currently being evaluated.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Six months after two mRNA-1273 injections, booster with 50 μg mRNA-1273, mRNA-1273.211, or mRNA-1273.351 induced neutralization against Beta, Gamma, and Delta comparable to wild-type D614G.
“The neutralization effect of the booster in each immunization group against SARS-CoV-2 variants Beta, Gamma and Delta reached a level comparable to that observed against the wild-type D614G strain.”
From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [416]
Among the three booster vaccines evaluated, multivalent mRNA-1273.211 induced the largest geometric mean titers for Beta, Gamma, and Delta.
“Among the three booster vaccines evaluated, the multivalent mRNA-1273.211 induced the largest geometric mean titers (GMT) for variants Beta, Gamma and Delta.415,416”
From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [416]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 84
- Authors
- Wu, K., Choi, A., Koch, M., Ma, L., Hill, A., Nunna, N., Huang, W., Oestreicher, J., Colpitts, T., Bennett, H., Legault, H., Paila, Y., Nestorova, B., Ding, B., Pajon, R., Miller, J. M., Leav, B., Carfi, A., McPhee, R., & Edwards, D. K.
- Affiliations
- Moderna Therapeutics (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- McPhee, Roderick
- Edwards, Darin K
- ORCID
- Venue
- medRxiv
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-05-06
- OpenAlex
- W3158136279
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 42
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Moderna
- Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (75A50120C00034)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 booster vaccination, mRNA-1273, B.1.351 variant, P.1 variant, neutralizing antibodies, antibody waning, vaccine safety, immunogenicity, pseudovirus neutralization, multivalent vaccine, spike protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review