A multiscale approach for computing gated ligand binding from molecular dynamics and Brownian dynamics simulations
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00673 · Paper page
Abstract
We develop an approach to characterise the effects of gating by a multi-conformation protein consisting of macrostate conformations that are either accessible or inaccessible to ligand binding. We first construct a Markov state model of the apo-protein from atomistic molecular dynamics simulations from which we identify macrostates and their conformations, compute their relative macrostate populations and interchange kinetics, and structurally characterise them in terms of ligand accessibility. We insert the calculated first-order rate constants for conformational transitions into a multi-state gating theory from which we derive a gating factor γ that quantifies the degree of conformational gating. Applied to HIV-1 protease, our approach yields a kinetic network of three accessible (semi-open, open and wide-open) and two inaccessible (closed and a newly identified, ‘parted’) macrostate conformations. The ‘parted’ conformation sterically partitions the active site, suggesting a possible role in product release. We find that the binding kinetics of drugs and drug-like inhibitors to HIV-1 protease falls in the slow gating regime. However, because γ =0.75, conformational gating only modestly slows ligand binding. Brownian dynamics simulations of the diffusional association of eight inhibitors to the protease - that have a wide range of experimental association constants (~10 4 - 10 10 M −1 s −1 ) - yields gated rate constants in the range ~0.5-5.7 × 10 8 M −1 s −1 . This indicates that, whereas the association rate of some inhibitors could be described by the model, for many inhibitors either subsequent conformational transitions or alternate binding mechanisms may be rate-limiting. For systems known to be modulated by conformational gating, the approach could be scaled computationally efficiently to screen association kinetics for a large number of ligands. Graphical TOC Entry:
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Identification of slow molecular order parameters for Markov model construction
Pérez-Hernández, G., Paul, F., Giorgino, T., De Fabritiis, G., & Noé, F. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4811489 · Cited by 990 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Finding the appropriate CV space is still a major challenge, despite considerable efforts at systemisation [54–56].”
BackgroundMarkov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Schwantes, C. R., & Pande, V. S. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300878a · Cited by 597 · see citing works
A Variational Approach to Modeling Slow Processes in Stochastic Dynamical Systems
Noé, F., & Nüske, F. (2013) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/110858616 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Sadiq, S. K., Chicharro, A. M., Friedrich, P., & Wade, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (DE)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Sadiq, S. Kashif
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-06-23
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7912-7929
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3208962440
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research (108680)
- European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (115366)
- European Commission (115366, 720270, HORIZON2020)
- Volkswagen Foundation
- Klaus Tschira Stiftung
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (720270)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Keywords
- conformational gating, ligand binding kinetics, HIV-1 protease, Markov state models, conformational change, Brownian dynamics, drug binding kinetics, active site conformation, product launch, ligand screening
- MeSH terms
- Kinetics, Ligands, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Catalytic Domain, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review