PreprintCited by 275SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchImmune responses and vaccinationsvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Anti- SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain Antibody Evolution after mRNA Vaccination

Open access
Cho, Alice, Muecksch, Frauke, Schaefer-Babajew, Dennis, Wang, Zijun, Finkin, Shlomo, Gaebler, Christian, Ramos, Victor, Cipolla, Melissa +19 more·2021·Nature

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-021-04060-7

Abstract

Summary: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection produces B-cell responses that continue to evolve for at least one year. During that time, memory B cells express increasingly broad and potent antibodies that are resistant to mutations found in variants of concern 1 . As a result, vaccination of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent individuals with currently available mRNA vaccines produces high levels of plasma neutralizing activity against all variants tested 1, 2 . Here, we examine memory B cell evolution 5 months after vaccination with either Moderna (mRNA-1273) or Pfizer- BioNTech (BNT162b2) mRNA vaccines in a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 naïve individuals. Between prime and boost, memory B cells produce antibodies that evolve increased neutralizing activity, but there is no further increase in potency or breadth thereafter. Instead, memory B cells that emerge 5 months after vaccination of naïve individuals express antibodies that are similar to those that dominate the initial response. While individual memory antibodies selected over time by natural infection have greater potency and breadth than antibodies elicited by vaccination, the overall neutralizing potency of plasma is greater following vaccination. These results suggest that boosting vaccinated individuals with currently available mRNA vaccines will increase plasma neutralizing activity but may not produce antibodies with breadth equivalent to those obtained by vaccinating convalescent individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.07.29.454333

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • mRNA vaccines induce robust germinal center responses in humans, resulting in memory B cells specific for full-length spike and RBD.

    “mRNA vaccines induce robust germinal center responses in humans (14, 15), which result in memory B cells that are specific for both the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) (16–18).”
  • Variant binding developed rapidly after two-dose mRNA vaccination but evolved more slowly after infection.

    “Variant binding developed rapidly after two-dose mRNA vaccination but evolved more slowly after infection, consistent with conclusions drawn from other approaches (17).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 65 · Cited by 275

Authors
Cho, A., Muecksch, F., Schaefer-Babajew, D., Wang, Z., Finkin, S., Gaebler, C., Ramos, V., Cipolla, M., Mendoza, P., Agudelo, M., Bednarski, E., DaSilva, J., Shimeliovich, I., Dizon, J., Daga, M., Millard, K., Turroja, M., Schmidt, F., Zhang, F., Tanfous, T. B., Jankovic, M., Oliveria, T. Y., Gazumyan, A., Caskey, M., Bieniasz, P. D., Hatziioannou, T., & Nussenzweig, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Rockefeller University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Caskey, Marina
  • Bieniasz, Paul D.
  • Nussenzweig, Michel C.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-07-29
Volume
600
Issue
7889
Pages
517-522
ISSN
0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201962062
Cited by
275
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 31 · 2013: 1
FWCI
19.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (P01-AI138398-S1, COVID-19, AI111825, TR001866, UL1TR001866)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI078788, U19AI111825, R37AI064003)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (TR001866)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 vaccination, mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, memory B cells, antibody evolution, receptor binding domain, neutralizing antibodies, antibody breadth, antibody potency, booster vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, convalescent patients
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, COVID-19 Vaccines, mRNA Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273, Memory B Cells, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibodies, Viral, Antibody Affinity, Cross Reactions, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neutralization Tests, Vaccines, Synthetic, Cohort Studies, Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte, Evolution, Molecular, Young Adult, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review