PreprintCited by 12SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness in immunosuppressed kidney transplant recipients

Open access
Chemaitelly, Hiam, AlMukdad, Sawsan, Joy, Jobin Paravila, Ayoub, Houssein H., Yassine, Hadi M., Benslimane, Fatiha M., Al Khatib, Hebah A., Tang, Patrick +22 more·2021·medRxiv

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccine protection against infection in immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients is unknown but possibly weak with the low proportion of these patients mounting a robust humoral and cellular immune response after vaccination. Using a retrospective cohort study design with cross-over, we assessed vaccine effectiveness among 782 kidney transplant recipients registered at Hamad Medical Corporation, the national public healthcare provider in Qatar, where the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines have been used in the national immunization campaign. Vaccine effectiveness against any SARS-CoV-2 infection was estimated at 46.6% (95% CI: 0.0-73.7%) ≥14 days after the second dose, 66.0% (95% CI: 21.3-85.3%) ≥42 days after the second dose, and 73.9% (95% CI: 33.0-89.9%) ≥56 days after the second dose. Vaccine effectiveness against any severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 disease was estimated at 72.3% (95% CI: 0.0-90.9%) ≥14 days after the second dose, 85.0% (95% CI: 35.7-96.5%) ≥42 days after the second dose, and 83.8% (95% CI: 31.3-96.2%) ≥56 days after the second dose. Most vaccine breakthrough infections occurred in the first few weeks after receiving the first and/or second dose. Vaccine effectiveness reached considerable levels in kidney transplant recipients, but vaccine protection mounted slowly and did not reach a high level until several weeks after the second dose.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.08.07.21261578

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The small number of third primary-series doses administered to immunocompromised individuals is not likely to affect the vaccine effectiveness estimates.

    “While nearly all third doses were administered as booster doses, few hundreds of them were administered as third primary-series doses for the immunocompromised population. However, this is not likely to affect our estimates as the number of immunocompromised individuals is very small in Qatar30, compared to the number of individuals who received the third dose as a booster dose.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Eberhardt CS, Balletto E, Cornberg M, Mikulska M. Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in transplant recipients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2021;34(4):275-287.
  2. Khairallah P, Aggarwal N, Awan AA, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on kidney transplantation and the kidney transplant recipient -One year into the pandemic. Transpl Int. 2021;34(4):612-621.
  3. Boyarsky BJ, Werbel WA, Avery RK, et al. Antibody Response to 2-Dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Series in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. JAMA. 2021;325(21):2204- 2206.
  4. Shostak Y, Shafran N, Heching M, et al. Early humoral response among lung transplant recipients vaccinated with BNT162b2 vaccine. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(6):e52-e53.
  5. Rabinowich L, Grupper A, Baruch R, et al. Low immunogenicity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among liver transplant recipients. J Hepatol. 2021;75(2):435-438.
  6. Boyarsky BJ, Werbel WA, Avery RK, et al. Immunogenicity of a Single Dose of SARS- CoV-2 Messenger RNA Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. JAMA. 2021;325(17):1784-1786.
  7. Benotmane I, Gautier-Vargas G, Cognard N, et al. Weak anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response after the first injection of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 2021;99(6):1487-1489.
  8. Benotmane I, Gautier-Vargas G, Cognard N, et al. Low immunization rates among kidney transplant recipients who received 2 doses of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Kidney Int. 2021;99(6):1498-1500.
  9. Yi SG, Knight RJ, Graviss EA, et al. Kidney Transplant Recipients Rarely Show an Early Antibody Response Following the First COVID-19 Vaccine Administration. Transplantation. 2021;105(7):e72-e73.
  10. Narasimhan M, Mahimainathan L, Clark AE, et al. Serological Response in Lung Transplant Recipients after Two Doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines. medRxiv. 2021:2021.2004.2026.21255926.
  11. Ben-Dov IZ, Oster Y, Tzukert K, et al. Impact of tozinameran (BNT162b2) mRNA vaccine on kidney transplant and chronic dialysis patients: 3-5 months followup. medRxiv. 2021:2021.2006.2012.21258813.
  12. Lemieux JE, Li A, Gentili M, et al. Vaccine serologic responses among transplant patients associate with COVID-19 infection and T peripheral helper cells. medRxiv. 2021:2021.2007.2011.21260338.
  13. Prendecki M, Thomson T, Clarke CL, et al. Comparison of humoral and cellular responses in kidney transplant recipients receiving BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 SARS- CoV-2 vaccines. medRxiv. 2021:2021.2007.2009.21260192.
  14. Benslimane FM, Al Khatib HA, Al-Jamal O, et al. One year of SARS-CoV-2: Genomic characterization of COVID-19 outbreak in Qatar. medRxiv. 2021:2021.2005.2019.21257433.
  15. Hasan MR, Kalikiri MKR, Mirza F, et al. Real-Time SARS-CoV-2 Genotyping by High- Throughput Multiplex PCR Reveals the Epidemiology of the Variants of Concern in Qatar. medRxiv. 2021:2021.2007.2018.21260718.
  16. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1999;94(446):496-509.
  17. Abu-Raddad LJ, Dargham S, Chemaitelly H, et al. COVID-19 risk score as a public health tool to guide targeted testing: A demonstration study in Qatar. medRxiv. 2021:2021.2003.2006.21252601.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chemaitelly, H., AlMukdad, S., Joy, J. P., Ayoub, H. H., Yassine, H. M., Benslimane, F. M., Al Khatib, H. A., Tang, P., Hasan, M. R., Coyle, P., Al Kanaani, Z., Al Kuwari, E., Jeremijenko, A., Kaleeckal, A. H., Latif, A. N., Shaik, R. M., Abdul Rahim, H. F., Nasrallah, G. K., Al Kuwari, M. G., Butt, A. A., Al Romaihi, H. E., Al-Thani, M. H., Alkadi, M. M., Ali, O., Al-Maslamani, M., Bertollini, R., Al Malki, H., Almaslamani, Y., Abu-Raddad, L. J., & Al Khal, A.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Hamad Medical Corporation (QA)
  • Qatar University (QA)
  • Sidra Medical and Research Center (QA)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Ministry of Public Health (QA)
Corresponding author
Abu-Raddad, Laith J.
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-08-09
OpenAlex
W3192169325
Cited by
12
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Hamad Medical Corporation
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
  • Weill Cornell Medicine - Qatar
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
kidney transplant recipients, immunosuppression, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, COVID-19 pandemic, breakthrough infection, severe COVID-19, solid organ transplant recipients, humoral and cellular immune response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review