PreprintCited by 8SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections Studiesvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Optimization of Non-Coding Regions Improves Protective Efficacy of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Nonhuman Primates

Open access
Gebre, Makda S., Rauch, Susanne, Roth, Nicole, Yu, Jingyou, Chandrashekar, Abishek, Mercado, Noe B., He, Xuan, Liu, Jinyan +23 more·2021·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

The CVnCoV (CureVac) mRNA vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 has recently been evaluated in a phase 2b/3 efficacy trial in humans. CV2CoV is a second-generation mRNA vaccine with optimized non-coding regions and enhanced antigen expression. Here we report a head-to-head study of the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of CVnCoV and CV2CoV in nonhuman primates. We immunized 18 cynomolgus macaques with two doses of 12 ug of lipid nanoparticle formulated CVnCoV, CV2CoV, or sham (N=6/group). CV2CoV induced substantially higher binding and neutralizing antibodies, memory B cell responses, and T cell responses as compared with CVnCoV. CV2CoV also induced more potent neutralizing antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants, including B.1.351 (beta), B.1.617.2 (delta), and C.37 (lambda). While CVnCoV provided partial protection against SARS-CoV-2 challenge, CV2CoV afforded robust protection with markedly lower viral loads in the upper and lower respiratory tract. Antibody responses correlated with protective efficacy. These data demonstrate that optimization of non-coding regions can greatly improve the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in nonhuman primates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.08.13.456316

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phase I clinical data showed CVnCoV has acceptable tolerance and high immunogenicity.

    “Phase I clinical data showed that CVnCoV has acceptable tolerance and high immunogenicity.29,427”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [427]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nicole Roth, J.S., Donata Hoffmann, Moritz Thran, Andreas Thess, Stefan O. Mueller, Benjamin Petsch and Susanne Rauch, CV2CoV, an enhanced mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate, supports higher protein expression and improved immunogenicity in rats. bioRxiv, 2021.

Authors
Gebre, M. S., Rauch, S., Roth, N., Yu, J., Chandrashekar, A., Mercado, N. B., He, X., Liu, J., McMahan, K., Martinot, A., Giffin, T., Hope, D., Patel, S., Sellers, D., Sanborn, O., Barrett, J., Liu, X., Cole, A. C., Pessaint, L., Valentin, D., Flinchbaugh, Z., Yalley-Ogunro, J., Muench, J., Brown, R., Cook, A., Teow, E., Andersen, H., Lewis, M. G., Mueller, S. O., Petsch, B., & Barouch, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • CureVac (Germany) (DE)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Bioqual (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rauch, Susanne
  • Barouch, Dan H.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-08-16
OpenAlex
W3195246271
Cited by
8
References
41
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nd
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01KI20703)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, mRNA vaccines, lipid nanoparticles, immunogenicity, neutralizing antibodies, memory B cells, T cell response, SARS-CoV-2 variants, Beta variant, Delta variant, viral load, respiratory tract, non-human primates, cynomolgus macaques, vaccine efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review