PreprintCited by 41Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PatchMAN docking: Modeling peptide-protein interactions in the context of the receptor surface

Open access
Khramushin, Alisa, Tsaban, Tomer, Varga, Julia, Avraham, Orly, Schueler-Furman, Ora·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2121153119

Abstract

Peptide docking can be perceived as a subproblem of protein-protein docking. However, due to the short length and flexible nature of peptides, many do not adopt one defined conformation prior to binding. Therefore, to tackle a peptide docking problem, not only the relative orientation between the two partners, but also the bound conformation of the peptide needs to be modeled. Traditional peptide-centered approaches use information about the peptide sequence to generate a representative conformer ensemble, which can then be rigid body docked to the receptor. Alternatively, one may look at this problem from the viewpoint of the receptor, namely that the protein surface defines the peptide bound conformation.We present PatchMAN (Patch-Motif AligNments), a novel peptide docking approach which uses structural motifs to map the receptor surface with backbone scaffolds extracted from protein structures. On a non-redundant set of protein-peptide complexes, starting from free receptor structures, PatchMAN successfully models and identifies near-native peptide-protein complexes in 62% / 81% within 2.5Å / 5Å RMSD, with corresponding sampling in 81% / 100% of the cases, outperforming other approaches. PatchMAN leverages the observation that structural units of peptides with their binding pocket can be found not only within interfaces, but also within monomers. We show that the conformation of the bound peptide is sampled based on the structural context of the receptor only, without taking into account any sequence information. Beyond peptide docking, this approach opens exciting new avenues to study principles of peptide-protein association, and to the design of new peptide binders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.09.02.458699

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.06.004 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.011 · DOI
  3. 2021, Trends in peptide drug discovery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov, 20, 309, 10.1038/s41573-020-00135-8 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/prot.22716 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/nar/gkr431 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.str.2015.05.021 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkx335 · DOI
  9. O. Schueler-Furman , N. London , Modeling peptide-protein interactions: Methods and protocols (Humana Press, 2017). · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005905 · DOI
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023294 · DOI
  13. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0959 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/prot.21117 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2019, Predicting protein-peptide interaction sites using distant protein complexes as structural templates, Sci. Rep, 9, 4267, 10.1038/s41598-019-38498-7 · DOI
  16. 2016, Fully Blind Docking at the Atomic Level for Protein-Peptide Complex Structure Prediction, Structure, 24, 1842, 10.1016/j.str.2016.07.021 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/pro.3771 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.1200678109 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1093/nar/gkv495 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.str.2009.06.013 · DOI
  21. T. Tsaban , et al., Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide-protein docking. BioRxiv (2021) https:/doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.01.454656. · DOI
  22. 10.1002/pro.2610 · DOI
  23. 2020, ELM-the eukaryotic linear motif resource in 2020, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, D296
  24. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80334-2 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00068-6 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 1996, Tumor marker disaccharide D-Gal-beta 1, 3-GalNAc complexed to heat-labile enterotoxin from Escherichia coli, Protein Sci, 5, 1184, 10.1002/pro.5560050621 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600046 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80836-3 · DOI
  29. 10.2210/pdb6txs/pdb · DOI
  30. 2020, Modeling beta-sheet peptide-protein interactions: Rosetta FlexPepDock in CAPRI rounds 38-45, Proteins, 88, 1037, 10.1002/prot.25871 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.str.2013.02.023 · DOI
  32. 10.1107/S0567739476001873 · DOI
  33. 2017, Modeling disordered protein interactions from biophysical principles, PLoS Comput. Biol, 13, e1005485, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005485 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  36. A. Leaver-Fay , J. Snoeyink , B. Kuhlman , “On-the-Fly Rotamer Pair Energy Evaluation in Protein Design” in Bioinformatics Research and Applications, I. Măndoiu , R. Sunderraman , A. Zelikovsky , Eds. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 343–354. · DOI
  37. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6798-8_9 · DOI
  38. 2020, InterPep2: global peptide-protein docking using interaction surface templates, Bioinformatics, 36, 2458, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa005 · DOI
  39. 10.2210/pdb1ssh/pdb · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Khramushin, A., Tsaban, T., Varga, J., Avraham, O., & Schueler-Furman, O.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-09-03
Volume
119
Issue
18
Pages
e2121153119-e2121153119
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224997394
Cited by
41
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation (2015/207)
  • Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities (301/2021, 717/2017)
  • Israel Science Foundation (717/2017)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein-peptide docking, protein-peptide complex, structural motifs, peptide conformation
MeSH terms
Membrane Proteins, Peptides, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Biophysical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review