PreprintCited by 120Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Protein embeddings and deep learning predict binding residues for various ligand classes

Open access
Littmann, Maria, Heinzinger, Michael, Dallago, Christian, Weissenow, Konstantin, Rost, Burkhard·2021·Scientific Reports

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41598-021-03431-4

Abstract

One important aspect of protein function is the binding of proteins to ligands, including small molecules, metal ions, and macromolecules such as DNA or RNA. Despite decades of experimental progress many binding sites remain obscure. Here, we proposed bindEmbed21 , a method predicting whether a protein residue binds to metal ions, nucleic acids, or small molecules. The Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based method exclusively uses embeddings from the Transformer-based protein Language Model (pLM) ProtT5 as input. Using only single sequences without creating multiple sequence alignments (MSAs), bindEmbed21DL outperformed MSA-based predictions. Combination with homology-based inference increased performance to F1=48±3% (95% CI) and MCC=0.46±0.04 when merging all three ligand classes into one. All results were confirmed by three independent data sets. Focusing on very reliably predicted residues could complement experimental evidence: For the 25% most strongly predicted binding residues, at least 73% were correctly predicted even when ignoring the problem of missing experimental annotations. The new method bindEmbed21 is fast, simple, and broadly applicable - neither using structure nor MSAs. Thereby, it found binding residues in over 42% of all human proteins not otherwise implied in binding and predicted about 6% of all residues as binding to metal ions, nucleic acids, or small molecules.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.09.03.458869

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 62 · Cited by 120

Authors
Littmann, M., Heinzinger, M., Dallago, C., Weissenow, K., & Rost, B.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Littmann, Maria
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-09-05
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
23916-23916
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225438928
Cited by
120
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-GZ: RO1320/4-1, RO1320/4‐1)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01IS17049, 031L0168)
  • Technische Universität München
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein-ligand binding prediction, protein embeddings, ProtT5, metal ion binding, nucleic acid binding, small molecule binding, protein annotation
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Binding Sites, Ligands, Metals, Nucleic Acids, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Software, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review