The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gene structure-based homology search identifies highly divergent putative effector gene family
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/gbe/evac069
Abstract
Homology of highly divergent genes often cannot be determined from sequence similarity alone. For example, we recently identified in Hormaphis cornu a family of rapidly evolving bicycle genes, which encode novel proteins implicated as plant gall effectors. Sequence similarity search methods yielded few putative bicycle homologs in other species. Coding sequence-independent features of genes, such as intron-exon boundaries, often evolve more slowly than coding sequences, however, and can provide complementary evidence for homology. We found that a linear logistic regression classifier using only structural features of bicycle genes identified many putative bicycle homologs in other species. Independent evidence from sequence features and intron locations supported homology assignments. To test the potential roles of bicycle genes in other aphids, we sequenced the genome of a second gall- forming aphid, Tetraneura ulmi , and found that many bicycle genes are strongly expressed in the salivary glands of the gall forming foundress. In addition, bicycle genes are strongly overexpressed in the salivary glands of a non-gall forming aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum , and in the non-gall forming generations of Hormaphis cornu . These observations suggest that Bicycle proteins may be used by multiple aphid species to manipulate plants in diverse ways. Incorporation of gene structural features into sequence search algorithms may aid identification of deeply divergent homologs, especially of rapidly evolving genes involved in host-parasite interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 84
- 10.1093/nar/gkv587 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11829-013-9278-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90258-2 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.en.20.010175.000403 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/20.19.5354 · DOI
- 10.1111/1755-0998.13258 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0301 · DOI
- 1994, Sink strength and clone size of sympatric, gall-forming aphids, European Journal of Entomology, 91, 57
- 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800146 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12915-016-0321-y · DOI
- 10.1093/gigascience/giz033 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1918410117 · DOI
- 10.1093/jxb/eru450 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00396.x · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2020.01230 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006790 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncomms1632 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.06.018 · DOI
- Emms DM . 2019. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics 14. · DOI
- Emms DM , Kelly S . 2018. STAG: Species Tree Inference from All Genes. bioRxiv 1–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/267914 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fphys.2020.596392 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.12.009 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-1036-7_5 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.1883 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.043 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0134(20001101)41:2<224::AID-PROT70>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.05.003 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1815820115 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-11-431 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msz261 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.05.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.104 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.04.016 · DOI
- 10.1111/1755-0998.13232 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msz138 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msaa095 · DOI
- 10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-207 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkz268 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3756723 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-016-1145-3 · DOI
- 10.1534/g3.120.401358 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msaa246 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0708958105 · DOI
- Mutti NS , Park Y , Reeck. 2006. RNAi knockdown of a salivary transcript leading to lethality in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Journal of Insect Science 6. · DOI
- 10.1186/s12864-015-1525-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx445 · DOI
- 10.1002/ps.5457 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.03.016 · DOI
- Parr T . 1940. Asterolecanium Variolosum Ratzeburg, A Gall-Forming Coccid, and its Effect Upon the Host Trees. YALE SCHOOL OF THE ENVIRONMENT BULLETIN SERIES 90.
- 10.1038/nature08798 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/mst112 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0025709 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.12.007 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000313 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12915-020-00820-5 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.16.01458 · DOI
- 2000, Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 454, 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01967-4 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1999.00149.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0500383102 · DOI
- 10.2174/1874404400701010001 · DOI
- 10.1093/database/bax032 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1068280500003026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.08.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.baae.2005.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tig.2011.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbs017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/eLife.53500 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1617640114 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10267 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00170675 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.214874.116 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000862 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0703535104 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ibmb.2014.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1111/1755-0998.13159 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-014-0521-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/gigascience/giz113 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msm088 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gene.2013.09.064 · DOI
- 10.1093/gigascience/gix109 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Stern, D. L., & Han, C.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stern, David L.
- Venue
- Genome Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-09-25
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1759-6653 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9168663
- OpenAlex
- W4229446964
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Genome Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Hemiptera Insect Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- homology detection, gene structure, exon-intron structure, logistic regression classifier, Acyrthosiphon pisum, salivary glands, host-parasite interactions, rapidly evolving genes, plant manipulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Aphids, Host-Parasite Interactions, Plants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review