Atomic-Resolution Prediction of Degrader-mediated Ternary Complex Structures by Combining Molecular Simulations with Hydrogen Deuterium Exchange
Open accessAbstract
Targeted protein degradation (TPD) has emerged as a powerful approach in drug discovery for removing (rather than inhibiting) proteins implicated in diseases. A key step in this approach is the formation of an induced proximity complex, where a degrader molecule recruits an E3 ligase to the protein of interest (POI), facilitating the transfer of ubiquitin to the POI and initiating the proteasomal degradation process. Here, we address three critical aspects of the TPD process: 1) formation of the ternary complex induced by a degrader molecule, 2) conformational heterogeneity of the ternary complex, and 3) assessment of ubiquitination propensity via the full Cullin Ring Ligase (CRL) macromolecular assembly. The novel approach presented here combines experimental biophysical data—in this case hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS, which measures the solvent exposure of protein residues)—with all-atom explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations aided by enhanced sampling techniques to predict structural ensembles of ternary complexes at atomic resolution. We present results demonstrating the efficiency, accuracy, and reliability of our approach to predict ternary structure ensembles using the bromodomain of SMARCA2 (SMARCA2 BD ) with the E3 ligase VHL as the system of interest. The simulations reproduce X-ray crystal structures – including prospective simulations validated on a new structure that we determined in this work (PDB ID: 7S4E) – with root mean square deviations (RMSD) of 1.1 to 1.6 Å. The simulations also reveal a structural ensemble of low-energy conformations of the ternary complex within a broad energy basin. To further characterize the structural ensemble, we used snapshots from the aforementioned simulations as seeds for Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics (HREMD) simulations, and then perform 7.1 milliseconds of aggregate simulation time using Folding@home. The resulting free energy surface identifies the crystal structure conformation within a broad low-energy basin and the dynamic ensemble is consistent with solution-phase biophysical experimental data (HDX-MS and small-angle x-ray scattering, SAXS). Finally, we graft structures from the ternary complexes onto the full CRL and perform enhanced sampling simulations, where we find that differences in degradation efficiency can be explained by the proximity distribution of lysine residues on the POI relative to the E2-loaded ubiquitin. Several of the top predicted ubiquitinated lysine residues are validated prospectively through a ubiquitin mapping proteomics experiment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Latest studies have incorporated molecular dynamics as a more thorough computational approach to assess PROTAC-related thermodynamics.
“The latest studies have incorporated molecular dynamics as a more thorough computational approach to assess PROTAC-related thermodynamics.[179][180][181]”
From Chasing molecular glue degraders: screening approaches (2022) · cites this paper as [181]
Some recent studies have shown that only ternary complex models with optimal target-lysine accessibility for E2 could predict target degradation outcomes.
“Moreover, some recent studies have shown that only the ternary complex models with optimal target-lysine accessibility for the E2 could predict target degradation outcomes.[181][182][183]”
From Chasing molecular glue degraders: screening approaches (2022) · cites this paper as [181]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 112 · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [13](13) Schapira, M.; Calabrese, M. F.; Bullock, A. N.; Crews, C. M. Targeted protein 1407 degradation: expanding the toolbox. Nature reviews Drug discovery 2019 , 18, 1408 949-963. 1409 -
- [17](17) Casement, R.; Bond, A.; Craigon, C.; Ciulli, A. Targeted Protein Degradation; 1421 Springer, 2021; pp 79-113. 1422 -
- [36](36) Farnaby, W.; Koegl, M.; Roy, M. J.; Whitworth, C.; Diers, E.; Trainor, N.; 1483 Zollman, D.; Steurer, S.; Karolyi-Oezguer, J.; Riedmueller, C., et al. BAF com1484 plex vulnerabilities in cancer demonstrated via structure-based PROTAC design. 1485 Nature chemical biology 2019 , 15, 672-680. 1486 -
- [79](79) Maier, J. A.; Martinez, C.; Kasavajhala, K.; Wickstrom, L.; Hauser, K. E.; Sim1620 merling, C. ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone 1621 Parameters from ff99SB. J CHEM THEORY COMPUT 2015 , 11, 3696-3713. 1622 -
- [83](83) Darden, T.; York, D.; Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N · log(N) method 1631 for Ewald sums in large systems. jcp 1993 , 98, 10089-10092. 1632 -
- [100](100) Ruprecht, B.; Zecha, J.; Zolg, D. P.; Kuster, B. Proteomics. Methods in 1681 Molecular Biology 2017 , 1550, 83-98. 1682 -
- Authors
- Dixon, T., MacPherson, D., Mostofian, B., Dauzhenka, T., Lotz, S., McGee, D., Shechter, S., Shrestha, U. R., Wiewiora, R., McDargh, Z. A., Pei, F., Pal, R., Ribeiro, J. V., Wilkerson, T., Sachdeva, V., Gao, N., Jain, S., Sparks, S., Li, Y., Vinitsky, A., Zhang, X., Razavi, A. M., Kolossváry, I., Imbriglio, J., Evdokimov, A., Bergeron, L., Zhou, W., Adhikari, J., Ruprecht, B., Dickson, A., Xu, H., Sherman, W., & Izaguirre, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Roivant Sciences (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dickson, Alex
- Xu, Huafeng
- Sherman, Woody
- ORCID
- Dixon, Tom
- MacPherson, Derek
- Mostofian, Barmak
- Dauzhenka, Taras
- Lotz, Samuel
- McGee, Dwight
- Shechter, Sharon
- Shrestha, Utsab R.
- Wiewiora, Rafal
- McDargh, Zachary A.
- Pei, Fen
- Pal, Rajat
- Ribeiro, João V.
- Sachdeva, Vipin
- Gao, Ning
- Jain, Shourya
- Sparks, Samuel
- Li, Yunxing
- Vinitsky, Alexander
- Zhang, Xin
- Razavi, Asghar M.
- Kolossváry, István
- Evdokimov, Artem
- Zhou, Wenchang
- Adhikari, Jagat
- Ruprecht, Benjamin
- Dickson, Alex
- Xu, Huafeng
- Sherman, Woody
- Izaguirre, Jesus A.
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-09-26
- OpenAlex
- W3204876300
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Keywords
- targeted protein degradation, ternary complex structure, E3 ubiquitin ligase, VHL, cullin-RING ligases, ubiquitination, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, molecular dynamics simulation, Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics, conformational heterogeneity, solvent exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review