The social architecture of an in-depth cellular protein interactome
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-023-06739-5 · Paper page
Abstract
Nearly all cellular functions are mediated by protein-protein interactions and mapping the interactome provides fundamental insights into the regulation and structure of biological systems. In principle, affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS) is an ideal and scalable tool, however, it has been difficult to identify low copy number complexes, membrane complexes and those disturbed by protein-tagging. As a result, our current knowledge of the interactome is far from complete, and assessing the reliability of reported interactions is challenging. Here we develop a sensitive, high-throughput, and highly reproducible AP-MS technology combined with a quantitative two-dimensional analysis strategy for comprehensive interactome mapping of Saccharomyces cerevisiae . We reduced required cell culture volumes thousand-fold and employed 96-well formats throughout, allowing replicate analysis of the endogenous green fluorescent protein (GFP) tagged library covering the entire expressed yeast proteome. The 4159 pull-downs generated a highly structured network of 3,909 proteins connected by 29,710 interactions. Compared to previous large-scale studies, we double the number of proteins (nodes in the network) and triple the number of reliable interactions (edges), including very low abundant epigenetic complexes, organellar membrane complexes and non-taggable complexes interfered by abundance correlation. This nearly saturated interactome reveals that the vast majority of yeast proteins are highly connected, with an average of 15 interactors, the majority of them unreported so far. Similar to social networks between humans, the average shortest distance is 4.2 interactions. A web portal ( www.yeast-interactome.org ) enables exploration of our dataset by the network and biological communities and variations of our AP-MS technology can be employed in any organism or dynamic conditions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Proteomic and interactomic insights into the molecular basis of cell functional diversity
Bludau, I., & Aebersold, R. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0231-2 · Cited by 297 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, these analyses have been limited by the incompleteness of the data, especially in multicellular species (23).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Accurate Label-Free Quantification by directLFQ to Compare Unlimited Numbers of Proteomes
Ammar, C., Schessner, J. P., Willems, S., Michaelis, A. C., & Mann, M. (2023) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100581 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“Figure 2A depicts the timing results for the very large dataset of our recent yeast interactome project 30 as processed by MaxQuant.”
MethodSelf-citationSkowronek, P., Wallmann, G., Wahle, M., Willems, S., & Mann, M. (2025) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-024-01104-w · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationLabel-free visual proteomics: Coupling MS- and EM-based approaches in structural biology
Klykov, O. V., Kopylov, M., Carragher, B. O., Heck, A. J. R., Noble, A. J., & Scheltema, R. A. (2022) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.027 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Detecting predicted cancer-testis antigens in proteomics datasets of healthy and tumoral samples
Machado, K., Fiúza, T. D. S., de Souza, S. D., & de Souza, G. D. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3476235 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“3) [33].”
- Authors
- Michaelis, A. C., Brunner, A.-D., Zwiebel, M., Meier, F., Strauss, M. T., Bludau, I., & Mann, M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (DE)
- Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
- Jena University Hospital (DE)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Mann, Matthias
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-10-26
- Volume
- 624
- Issue
- 7990
- Pages
- 192-200
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10700138
- OpenAlex
- W4388694323
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (191046)
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Novo Nordisk (NNF14CC0001)
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF 14CC0001)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Biotin and Related Studies
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, interactome mapping, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, affinity purification mass spectrometry, membrane protein complexes, AlphaFold-Multimer, protein complex structure prediction
- MeSH terms
- Fungal Proteins, Humans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mass Spectrometry, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Proteome, Protein Interaction Mapping, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Epigenesis, Genetic, Protein Interaction Maps
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review