PreprintCited by 105Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

Contrastive learning on protein embeddings enlightens midnight zone

Open access
Heinzinger, Michael, Littmann, Maria, Sillitoe, Ian, Bordin, Nicola, Orengo, Christine, Rost, Burkhard·2021·NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/nargab/lqac043

Abstract

Experimental structures are leveraged through multiple sequence alignments, or more generally through homology-based inference (HBI), facilitating the transfer of information from a protein with known annotation to a query without any annotation. A recent alternative expands the concept of HBI from sequence-distance lookup to embedding-based annotation transfer (EAT). These embeddings are derived from protein Language Models (pLMs). Here, we introduce using single protein representations from pLMs for contrastive learning. This learning procedure creates a new set of embeddings that optimizes constraints captured by hierarchical classifications of protein 3D structures defined by the CATH resource. The approach, dubbed ProtTucker , has an improved ability to recognize distant homologous relationships than more traditional techniques such as threading or fold recognition. Thus, these embeddings have allowed sequence comparison to step into the “midnight zone” of protein similarity, i.e., the region in which distantly related sequences have a seemingly random pairwise sequence similarity. The novelty of this work is in the particular combination of tools and sampling techniques that ascertained good performance comparable or better to existing state-of-the-art sequence comparison methods. Additionally, since this method does not need to generate alignments it is also orders of magnitudes faster. The code is available at https://github.com/Rostlab/EAT .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.11.14.468528

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinzinger, M., Littmann, M., Sillitoe, I., Bordin, N., Orengo, C., & Rost, B.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Heinzinger, Michael
  • Rost, Burkhard
Venue
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-11-15
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
lqac043-lqac043
ISSN
2631-9268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282984452
Cited by
105
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-GZ: RO1320/4-1, RO1320/4‐1)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01IS17049, 031L0168)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
contrastive learning, protein embeddings, protein language models, distant homology detection, protein structure annotation, sequence comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review