The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-State Modeling of G-protein Coupled Receptors at Experimental Accuracy
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/prot.26382 · Paper page
Abstract
The family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is one of the largest protein families in the human genome. GPCRs transduct chemical signals from extracellular to intracellular regions via a conformational switch between active and inactive states upon ligand binding. While experimental structures of GPCRs remain limited, high-accuracy computational predictions are now possible with AlphaFold2. However, AlphaFold2 only predicts one state and is biased towards either the active or inactive conformation depending on the GPCR class. Here, a multi-state prediction protocol is introduced that extends AlphaFold2 to predict either active or inactive states at very high accuracy using state-annotated templated GPCR databases. The predicted models accurately capture the main structural changes upon activation of the GPCR at the atomic level. For most of the benchmarked GPCRs (10 out of 15), models in the active and inactive states were closer to their corresponding activation state structures. Median RMSDs of the transmembrane regions were 1.12 Å and 1.41 Å for the active and inactive state models, respectively. The models were more suitable for protein-ligand docking than the original AlphaFold2 models and template-based models. Finally, our prediction protocol predicted accurate GPCR structures and GPCR-peptide complex structures in GPCR Dock 2021, a blind GPCR-ligand complex modeling competition. We expect that high accuracy GPCR models in both activation states will promote understanding in GPCR activation mechanisms and drug discovery for GPCRs. At the time, the new protocol paves the way towards capturing the dynamics of proteins at high-accuracy via machine-learning methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Sampling alternative conformational states of transporters and receptors with AlphaFold2
del Alamo, D., Sala, D., Mchaourab, H. S., & Meiler, J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.75751 · Cited by 511
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 2021, G protein-coupled receptors: structure-and function-based drug discovery, Signal Transduct Target Ther, 6, 7, 10.1038/s41392-020-00435-w · DOI
- 2020, Impact of GPCR Structures on Drug Discovery, Cell, 181, 81, 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.003 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1065659 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Applying and improving AlphaFold at CASP14, Proteins, 89, 1711, 10.1002/prot.26257 · DOI
- 2021, Target classification in the 14th round of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP14), Proteins, 89, 1618, 10.1002/prot.26202 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2164-8-338 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tins.2006.09.004 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.245092 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrd.2017.178 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1921851117 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-08630-2 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033910 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1810316115 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1110499108 · DOI
- Zhou Q , Yang D , Wu M , et al. Common activation mechanism of class A GPCRs. Elife. 2019;8. · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00177 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.289.5480.739 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.str.2015.06.007 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007597 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkx1109 · DOI
- 2021, GPCRdb in 2021: integrating GPCR sequence, structure and function, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D335, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1080 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.3213 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Topology evaluation of models for difficult targets in the 14th round of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP14), Proteins, 89, 1673, 10.1002/prot.26172 · DOI
- 2021, High-accuracy protein structure prediction in CASP14, Proteins, 89, 1687, 10.1002/prot.26171 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Structural basis of CXC chemokine receptor 2 activation and signalling, Nature, 585, 135, 10.1038/s41586-020-2492-5 · DOI
- 2018, GPCRM: a homology modeling web service with triple membrane-fitted quality assessment of GPCR models, Nucleic Acids Res, 46, W387, 10.1093/nar/gky429 · DOI
- 10.1021/jm9005252 · DOI
- 2021, Activation pathway of a G protein-coupled receptor uncovers conformational intermediates as targets for allosteric drug design, Nat Commun, 12, 4721, 10.1038/s41467-021-25020-9 · DOI
- Hilger D , Kumar KK , Hu H , et al. Structural insights into differences in G protein activation by family A and family B GPCRs. Science. 2020;369(6503). · DOI
- 2022, Structural basis of neuropeptide Y signaling through Y1 receptor, Nat Commun, 13, 853, 10.1038/s41467-022-28510-6 · DOI
- 2018, Clustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time, Nat Commun, 9, 2542, 10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · DOI · Paper page
- Mirdita M , Schütze K , Moriwaki Y , Heo L , Ovchinnikov S , Steinegger M. ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.2008.2015.456425. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ci300342z · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.21334 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004586 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-4020(80)80168-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
- Evans R , O’Neill M , Pritzel A , et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.2010.2004.463034. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Heo, L., & Feig, M.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feig, Michael
- Venue
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-11-27
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1873-1885
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9561049
- OpenAlex
- W4229000770
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 15
- FWCI
- 14.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM126948)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- G protein-coupled receptors, AlphaFold2, template-based modeling, GPCR activation mechanism, protein-ligand docking, transmembrane structure
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Ligands, Peptides, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review