PreprintCited by 215Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingProtein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-State Modeling of G-protein Coupled Receptors at Experimental Accuracy

Open access
Heo, Lim, Feig, Michael·2021·Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1002/prot.26382 · Paper page

Abstract

The family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is one of the largest protein families in the human genome. GPCRs transduct chemical signals from extracellular to intracellular regions via a conformational switch between active and inactive states upon ligand binding. While experimental structures of GPCRs remain limited, high-accuracy computational predictions are now possible with AlphaFold2. However, AlphaFold2 only predicts one state and is biased towards either the active or inactive conformation depending on the GPCR class. Here, a multi-state prediction protocol is introduced that extends AlphaFold2 to predict either active or inactive states at very high accuracy using state-annotated templated GPCR databases. The predicted models accurately capture the main structural changes upon activation of the GPCR at the atomic level. For most of the benchmarked GPCRs (10 out of 15), models in the active and inactive states were closer to their corresponding activation state structures. Median RMSDs of the transmembrane regions were 1.12 Å and 1.41 Å for the active and inactive state models, respectively. The models were more suitable for protein-ligand docking than the original AlphaFold2 models and template-based models. Finally, our prediction protocol predicted accurate GPCR structures and GPCR-peptide complex structures in GPCR Dock 2021, a blind GPCR-ligand complex modeling competition. We expect that high accuracy GPCR models in both activation states will promote understanding in GPCR activation mechanisms and drug discovery for GPCRs. At the time, the new protocol paves the way towards capturing the dynamics of proteins at high-accuracy via machine-learning methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.11.26.470086

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 2021, G protein-coupled receptors: structure-and function-based drug discovery, Signal Transduct Target Ther, 6, 7, 10.1038/s41392-020-00435-w · DOI
  2. 2020, Impact of GPCR Structures on Drug Discovery, Cell, 181, 81, 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.003 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.1065659 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2021, Applying and improving AlphaFold at CASP14, Proteins, 89, 1711, 10.1002/prot.26257 · DOI
  7. 2021, Target classification in the 14th round of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP14), Proteins, 89, 1618, 10.1002/prot.26202 · DOI
  8. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-338 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.tins.2006.09.004 · DOI
  10. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.245092 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.04.001 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nrd.2017.178 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.1921851117 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41467-019-08630-2 · DOI
  15. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033910 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1073/pnas.1810316115 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.1110499108 · DOI
  18. Zhou Q , Yang D , Wu M , et al. Common activation mechanism of class A GPCRs. Elife. 2019;8. · DOI
  19. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00177 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.289.5480.739 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.str.2015.06.007 · DOI
  23. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007597 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1093/nar/gkx1109 · DOI
  25. 2021, GPCRdb in 2021: integrating GPCR sequence, structure and function, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D335, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1080 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/nmeth.3213 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2021, Topology evaluation of models for difficult targets in the 14th round of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP14), Proteins, 89, 1673, 10.1002/prot.26172 · DOI
  28. 2021, High-accuracy protein structure prediction in CASP14, Proteins, 89, 1687, 10.1002/prot.26171 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 2020, Structural basis of CXC chemokine receptor 2 activation and signalling, Nature, 585, 135, 10.1038/s41586-020-2492-5 · DOI
  32. 2018, GPCRM: a homology modeling web service with triple membrane-fitted quality assessment of GPCR models, Nucleic Acids Res, 46, W387, 10.1093/nar/gky429 · DOI
  33. 10.1021/jm9005252 · DOI
  34. 2021, Activation pathway of a G protein-coupled receptor uncovers conformational intermediates as targets for allosteric drug design, Nat Commun, 12, 4721, 10.1038/s41467-021-25020-9 · DOI
  35. Hilger D , Kumar KK , Hu H , et al. Structural insights into differences in G protein activation by family A and family B GPCRs. Science. 2020;369(6503). · DOI
  36. 2022, Structural basis of neuropeptide Y signaling through Y1 receptor, Nat Commun, 13, 853, 10.1038/s41467-022-28510-6 · DOI
  37. 2018, Clustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time, Nat Commun, 9, 2542, 10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Mirdita M , Schütze K , Moriwaki Y , Heo L , Ovchinnikov S , Steinegger M. ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.2008.2015.456425. · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1021/ci300342z · DOI
  41. 10.1002/jcc.21334 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004586 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0040-4020(80)80168-2 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Evans R , O’Neill M , Pritzel A , et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.2010.2004.463034. · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Heo, L., & Feig, M.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Feig, Michael
Venue
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-11-27
Volume
90
Issue
11
Pages
1873-1885
ISSN
0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229000770
Cited by
215
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 15
FWCI
14.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM126948)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
G protein-coupled receptors, AlphaFold2, template-based modeling, GPCR activation mechanism, protein-ligand docking, transmembrane structure
MeSH terms
Humans, Ligands, Peptides, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review