PreprintCited by 190Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

DeepRank-GNN: A Graph Neural Network Framework to Learn Patterns in Protein-Protein Interfaces

Open access
Réau, M., Renaud, N., Xue, L. C., Bonvin, A. M. J. J.·2021·Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac759 · Paper page

Abstract

Gaining structural insights into the protein-protein interactome is essential to understand biological phenomena and extract knowledge for rational drug design or protein engineering. We have previously developed DeepRank, a deep-learning framework to facilitate pattern learning from protein-protein interfaces using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) approaches. However, CNN is not rotation invariant and data augmentation is required to desensitize the network to the input data orientation which dramatically impairs the computation performance. Representing protein-protein complexes as atomic- or residue-scale rotation invariant graphs instead enables using graph neural networks (GNN) approaches, bypassing those limitations. We have developed DeepRank-GNN, a framework that converts protein-protein interfaces from PDB 3D coordinates files into graphs that are further provided to a pre-defined or user-defined GNN architecture to learn problem-specific interaction patterns. DeepRank-GNN is designed to be highly modularizable, easily customized, and is wrapped into a user-friendly python3 package. Here, we showcase DeepRank-GNN’s performance for scoring docking models using a dedicated graph interaction neural network (GINet). We show that this graph-based model performs better than DeepRank, DOVE and HADDOCK scores and competes with iScore on the CAPRI score set. We show a significant gain in speed and storage requirement using DeepRank-GNN as compared to DeepRank. DeepRank-GNN is freely available from https://github.com/DeepRank/DeepRank-GNN . Contact: a.m.j.j.bonvin@uu.nl

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.12.08.471762

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 190

Authors
Réau, M., Renaud, N., Xue, L. C., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Netherlands eScience Center (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Bonvin, A. M. J. J.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-12-10
Volume
39
Issue
1
ISSN
1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309862248
Cited by
190
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
19.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Netherlands eScience Center (823830, ASDI.2016.043)
  • European Commission (823830, HORIZON2020)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (823830, 718.015.001)
  • Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein-protein interfaces, graph neural networks, protein-protein interaction, rotation invariance
MeSH terms
Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review