PreprintCited by 2

No evidence of paralogous loci or new bona fide microRNAs in telomere to telomere (T2T) genomic data

Patil, Arun H., Halushka, Marc K., Fromm, Bastian·2021

Abstract

The telomere to telomere (T2T) genome project discovered and mapped ∼240 million additional base pairs of primarily telomeric and centromeric reads. Much of this sequence was comprised of satellite sequences and large segmental duplications. We evaluated the extent to which human bona fide microRNAs (miRNAs) may be found in additional paralogous genomic loci or if previously undescribed microRNAs are present in these newly sequenced regions of the human genome. New genomic regions of the T2T project spanning ∼240 million bp of sequence were obtained and evaluated by blastn for the human miRNAs contained in MirGeneDB2.0 (N=556) and miRBase (N = 1917) along with all species of MirGeneDB2.0 miRNAs (N=10,899). Additionally, bowtie was used to compare unmapped reads from >4,000 primary cell samples to the new T2T sequence. Based on sequence and structure, no bona fide miRNAs were identified. Ninety-seven miRNAs of questionable authenticity (frequently known repeat elements) were identified from the miRBase dataset across the newly described regions of the human genome. These 97 represent only 51 miRNA families due to paralogy of highly similar miRNAs such as 24 members of the hsa-mir-548 family. Altogether, this data strongly supports our having identified widely expressed bona fide miRNAs in the human genome and move us further toward the completion of human miRNA discovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.12.09.471935

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors recently explored new chromosomal regions of the genome from the work of the T2T consortium and found no new novel miRNAs or paralagous miRNA loci.

    “We recently explored new chromosomal regions of the genome from the work of the T2T consortium and found no new novel miRNAs or paralagous miRNA loci [37].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Altemose N, Logsdon GA, Bzikadze AV, Sidhwani P, Langley SA, Caldas GV, Hoyt SJ, Uralsky L, Ryabov FD, Shew CJ et al. 2021. Complete genomic and epigenetic maps of human centromeres. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/2021.07.12.452052: 2021.2007.2012.452052. · DOI
  2. Fromm B, Billipp T, Peck LE, Johansen M, Tarver JE, King BL, Newcomb JM, Sempere LF, Flatmark K, Hovig E et al. 2015. A Uniform System for the Annotation of Vertebrate microRNA Genes and the Evolution of the Human microRNAome. Annual review of genetics 49: 213-242.
  3. Fromm B, Hoye E, Domanska D, Zhong X, Aparicio-Puerta E, Ovchinnikov V, Umu SU, Chabot PJ, Kang W, Aslanzadeh M et al. 2021. MirGeneDB 2.1: toward a complete sampling of all major animal phyla. Nucleic Acids Res doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1101. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Langmead B. 2010. Aligning short sequencing reads with Bowtie. Current protocols in bioinformatics Chapter 11: Unit 11 17.
  5. Nurk S, Koren S, Rhie A, Rautiainen M, Bzikadze AV, Mikheenko A, Vollger MR, Altemose N, Uralsky L, Gershman A et al. 2021. The complete sequence of a human genome. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/2021.05.26.445798: 2021.2005.2026.445798. · DOI
  6. Vollger MR, Guitart X, Dishuck PC, Mercuri L, Harvey WT, Gershman A, Diekhans M, Sulovari A, Munson KM, Lewis AM et al. 2021. Segmental duplications and their variation in a complete human genome. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/2021.05.26.445678: 2021.2005.2026.445678. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patil, A. H., Halushka, M. K., & Fromm, B.
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-12-13
Cited by
2
References
2
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review